[SatinDoll]

I’m not surprised court cases have been unsuccessful as they are not the correct venue to seek a usurper’s removal. The Law is a tricky field and when you’re going after someone who has committed fraud, like Obama, it is doubly hard when he is in a supreme position of power.

Per the U.S. Constitution, only the Congress has the power to remove a President from office. Congress decades ago delegated the power to remove a usurper or ineligible President, via Quo Warranto, to the District Court of Washington, D.C.

[jamese777]

I’m not surprised court cases have been unsuccessful as they are not the correct venue to seek a usurper’s removal. The Law is a tricky field and when you’re going after someone who has committed fraud, like Obama, it is doubly hard when he is in a supreme position of power.

Per the U.S. Constitution, only the Congress has the power to remove a President from office. Congress decades ago delegated the power to remove a usurper or ineligible President, via Quo Warranto, to the District Court of Washington, D.C.

---

Orly Taitz attempted a Writ of Quo Warranto in the US District Court for the District of Columbia in “Taitz v Obama.” Ms. Taitz even “judge shopped” for her preferred judge to hear her lawsuit, Chief US Federal District Judge Royce C. Lamberth, a Reagan appointee. Judge Lamberth dismissed Ms. Taitz quo warranto suit with the words: “This is one of several suits filed by Ms. Taitz in her quixotic attempt to prove that President Obama is not a natural born citizen as required by the Constitution. This court is not willing to go tilting at windmills with her.”