1 posted on
06/12/2010 6:26:44 PM PDT by
SandRat
To: HiJinx; Borax Queen; idratherbepainting; AZHSer; Sabertooth; A Navy Vet; Lion Den Dan; ...
2 posted on
06/12/2010 6:27:06 PM PDT by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country! What else needs said?)
To: SandRat
Who the hell does this guy Frisancho think he is?
Ever notice how these leftists just assume they have standing to bring any damn legal action they want anytime they want?
3 posted on
06/12/2010 6:43:41 PM PDT by
THX 1138
("Harry, I have a gift.")
To: SandRat
"The law is clearly unconstitutional, but the overriding factor is that it does nothing about border violence and making neighborhoods safer," said Democratic state Rep. Ben Miranda, an opponent of the law and an attorney who's representing a Latino clergy group seeking to overturn it.
I'm sure this lowlife lawyer/state rep. will have no problem shopping around for an activist judge who will be eager to agree with him.
4 posted on
06/12/2010 6:47:07 PM PDT by
Pox
To: SandRat
I suppose I could read the briefs, but my first question is “Who appointed the judge?” That’s probably the determining factor on a summary judgement, and highlights why the Founding Fathers were concerned about the possibility of judicial despotism.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson