Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rintense

It’s an implied threat because the anti-freepers were known to go after visable FReepers by contacting their jobs and trying to get them fired.

I’d tread carefully if I were you, you’re playing with fire.


99 posted on 06/11/2010 12:15:37 PM PDT by Bob J (Support "4" Palin is more religious crusade than political movement. Nothing evil but buyer beware.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]


To: Bob J
It’s an implied threat because the anti-freepers were known to go after visable FReepers by contacting their jobs and trying to get them fired.

Ah, so now you're lumping us well established Freepers and Palin supporters in with the liberal anti-freeper scum now?

Is that it?

106 posted on 06/11/2010 12:19:39 PM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin has crossed the Rubicon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]

To: Bob J
You're off your rocker, bub. And for you to tell me to tread carefully is a laugh. You've made it your personal mission to obsess over Palin to the point you've burned quite a few bridges here. How many bannings is that now, Bob?

You're the one who should tread carefully, making accusations like that. If you have proof that happened, present it. I'm sure Jim would love to see it.

113 posted on 06/11/2010 12:23:19 PM PDT by rintense (God bless Israel!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson