Posted on 06/11/2010 10:44:41 AM PDT by Steelfish
Thank you Pissant. They sure are.
Glad you enjoyed it ;-)
did you come up with that all by yourself? Or did your mommy help you with the dirty words?
ROFL. D1 is a delusional poster that makes skyscrapers out of clouds.
the record is the record. you can spin it how you want. JD voted to increase spending across the board. He sided with Bush and the GOP congress form 2000-2006 on almost every item. he and all GOP members of the 2000-2006 congress were responsible for the biggest increase in Federal government power and spending ever seen up to Obama’s crowning.
you think electing people that enabled that will help stop the power grab? One word: delusional.
again pointing out faults of someone does not mean support for the other guy. you seem to have a problem accepting the truth. If you want to hide in your land of delusion and think that JD will vote the conservative ticket when a liberal GOPer like Mitt is in the WH go ahead. You will be disappointed.
McCain is no better. hopefully he will do a Bryd and Az can get a real conservative to run in the next primary instead of the beltway GOPers like JD and McCain.
T R O L L
the record is the record. you can spin it how you want.
You have spun it. Now you're upset that I have explained what actually took place. My heart bleeds for you.
JD voted to increase spending across the board.
J. D. voted for bills and resolutions like the best members of his party did, and unlike the worst members of the Democrat party did. People who are generally very good when it comes to taxes and spending voted with J. D. People who are terrible on spending and taxation, voted opposite of him.
He sided with Bush and the GOP congress form 2000-2006 on almost every item.
And he didn't side with these folks on almost every item during the same period, Nancy Pelosi(D), Tom Lantos(D), Henry Waxman(D), Maxine Waters(D), Jane Harman(D), Robert Wexler(D), Rahm Emanuel(D), John Conyers(D), Jerald Nadler(D), Charles Rangel(D), Dennis Kucinich(D), John Murtha(D), Patrick Kennedy(D), Bernard Sanders(I).
he and all GOP members of the 2000-2006 congress were responsible for the biggest increase in Federal government power and spending ever seen up to Obamas crowning.
So what you are saying is that you wish he had voted with Nancy Pelosi(D), Tom Lantos(D), Henry Waxman(D), Maxine Waters(D), Jane Harman(D), Robert Wexler(D), Rahm Emanuel(D), John Conyers(D), Jerald Nadler(D), Charles Rangel(D), Dennis Kucinich(D), John Murtha(D), Patrick Kennedy(D), Bernard Sanders(I).
you think electing people that enabled that will help stop the power grab? One word: delusional.
What I believe is that it would have been far worse if J. D. Hayworth had voted with Nancy Pelosi(D), Tom Lantos(D), Henry Waxman(D), Maxine Waters(D), Jane Harman(D), Robert Wexler(D), Rahm Emanuel(D), John Conyers(D), Jerald Nadler(D), Charles Rangel(D), Dennis Kucinich(D), John Murtha(D), Patrick Kennedy(D), Bernard Sanders(I).
Not understanding this, you call me dilusional. I'm comfortable with that.
again pointing out faults of someone does not mean support for the other guy.
There are two prominent people running, and you have spent all your time here trashing J. D. Hayworth, and explaining why it was a better idea to return John S. McCain to the Senate of the United States for another six years. None the less, you still claim that you don't support McCain any more than you do J. D. Hayworth.
We've now been conducting this exchange for seventeen days, but you don't really give a damn which way the election goes, according to you. And yet, you think folks are supposed to believe I am the dilusional one.
you seem to have a problem accepting the truth.
No, I've accepted what your truth is. That hasn't stopped me from revealing what that truth was for all to see. I accept it for what it is. I have destroyed it for what it is. No problem.
If you want to hide in your land of delusion and think that JD will vote the conservative ticket when a liberal GOPer like Mitt is in the WH go ahead.
Here you go again, revealing how unbiased you truly are when it comes to this election.
You will be disappointed.
I have seen what John S. McCain has done. I would term my reaction to be way beyond simple disappointment. I would term it more like the recognition of treason to the Conservative mindset in this nation.
You're just going to have to learn to live with my willingness to accept a little disappointment here and there, rather than see someone destroy our nation with the likes of Ted Kennedy, John Kerry, Russel Feingold, George Soros, Teressa Heinz Kerry, the Tides Foundation. John's activity is available here for all to see. LINK
Here are the people you claim are more Conservative than Hayworth on most of the votes you criticized him for.
Nancy Pelosi(D), Tom Lantos(D), Henry Waxman(D), Maxine Waters(D), Jane Harman(D), Robert Wexler(D), Rahm Emanuel(D), John Conyers(D), Jerald Nadler(D), Charles Rangel(D), Dennis Kucinich(D), John Murtha(D), Patrick Kennedy(D), Bernard Sanders(I)
McCain is no better.
You have spent seventeen days trashing J. D. Hayworth. You gave me a trumped up list of supposed violations that J. D. executed, even though he was voting against Nancy Pelosi(D), Tom Lantos(D), Henry Waxman(D), Maxine Waters(D), Jane Harman(D), Robert Wexler(D), Rahm Emanuel(D), John Conyers(D), Jerald Nadler(D), Charles Rangel(D), Dennis Kucinich(D), John Murtha(D), Patrick Kennedy(D), Bernard Sanders(I), with the same votes. You have in certain posts on this thread explained why the good people of Arizona should return McCain to the Senate for six more years, because he has seniority. And yet, at the same time, you want me to buy off on the idea you don't want McCain returned to the Senate.
Expletive deleted, you!
hopefully he will do a Bryd and Az can get a real conservative to run in the next primary instead of the beltway GOPers like JD and McCain.
J. D.'s voting record is just fine. Condor51 provided comments and links above. For J.D.'s 12 years in Congress, he was rated at 97.56% when his votes were evaluated by the American Conservative Union (ACU). In 2006, J. D.'s rating was 96%. In 2006 John S. McCain's voting record was 65%. LINK
Your attempt to destroy J. D. Hayworth is disgusting.
Nobody would go to the lengths you have to smear Hayworth over seventeen days without having a boner for John S. McCain.
I would encourage folks to read the post you are responding to here. They need to see you for what you are.
I hear ya.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.