Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: outpostinmass2

“Well Amtrak trains riding rails in the Northeast make money.”

True, but the majority of the people in the northeast live and reside in a close environment. And that is fine; however, not all of us want, nor NEED to live in this type surrounding.

I live in a town where the closest convenience store is about two miles away. My grocery store is six miles - one way.

I live about an hour driving time from my house to my city office. I have land to farm and I don’t hear the road noise from my backyard - that’s the way I like it and want it.

There are things in which the government needs to be involved - public roads is one of them - IMO.


86 posted on 06/11/2010 9:06:57 AM PDT by ExTxMarine (Hey Congress: Go Conservative or Go Home!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]


To: ExTxMarine

Rails are roads too.

My opinion is that the Federal government should not be in the intestate highway business only because I think a private company can build and maintain them cheaper and more efficiently.

I don’t care which mode of transportation is used.

If you support a federally controlled interstate highway system your argument against a federally controlled rail system is weak. They are both roads.


95 posted on 06/11/2010 9:16:25 AM PDT by outpostinmass2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson