Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fiorina and Boxer spar over abortion
LA Times ^ | 6/9/2010 | Maeve Reston

Posted on 06/10/2010 9:37:35 AM PDT by markomalley

The general-election contest between California Sen. Barbara Boxer and Carly Fiorina has just begun, but even in a year when voters’ main concern is the economy, it’s already shaping up to be a potentially vicious battle over abortion rights.

Though Boxer has long been the champion of abortion-rights groups, Fiorina has said she supports overturning Roe vs. Wade, the 1973 Supreme Court ruling that legalized abortion. And her endorsements by prominent anti-abortion groups, including the California ProLife Council and the Susan B. Anthony List, helped solidify her credentials as a conservative during the primary contest.

Fiorina’s position puts her at odds with the majority of California voters. Last year, two-thirds of Californians said they opposed overturning Roe vs. Wade, according to a poll by the Public Policy Institute of California. Among independents — who would be critical to Fiorina’s bid to defeat Boxer since Democrats outnumber Republicans in California — only 28% said they favored completely overturning the 1973 decision.

(Excerpt) Read more at latimesblogs.latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: barbaraboxer; boxer; ca2010; carly; carlyfiorina; elections; fiorina; moralabsolutes; proabortion; prolife; prolifefraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

1 posted on 06/10/2010 9:37:35 AM PDT by markomalley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Quit the makeover bs of Carly Fiorina. Just tell the truth about this woman. She is no conservative or friend of the people so why continue to lie about it.

I am sick of these perverted who keep trying to sink what the people really want.


2 posted on 06/10/2010 9:41:15 AM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Gosh, if that is the case, then BOXHEAD has this in the bag, right? She isn’t even gonna bother campaigning, right??

LOL.

L.A. Slimes crap.


3 posted on 06/10/2010 9:42:37 AM PDT by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freekitty

Well she’s now the candidate whether you like it or now, instead of ripping her down and contributing to a Boxer victory why not do what you can to get her elected?


4 posted on 06/10/2010 9:43:10 AM PDT by Thurston_Howell_III (Ahoy polloi... where did you come from, a scotch ad?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

if you came across a person in a coma... would you just kill them? they can’t speak for themselves. so why wouldn’t you?

because you make the assumption they would want to live.

i am 100% certain that if you could ask a fetus whether or not it would like to live, i am ABSOLUTELY certain they would say yes.

so how are the two situations any different?


5 posted on 06/10/2010 9:43:28 AM PDT by sten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
I am looking forward to the debates between these two women.
6 posted on 06/10/2010 9:44:22 AM PDT by zeaal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

I look forward to seeing Boxer retired from office.

It takes some courage to run for state-wide office in California on a pro-life platform. It shouldn’t take courage, but sadly it does.


7 posted on 06/10/2010 9:44:43 AM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freekitty

Does this mean you are supporting Barbara Boxer?


8 posted on 06/10/2010 9:49:47 AM PDT by reaganrevolutionin2010
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: freekitty

Assume that the LA Times is writing their article for latte-drinking Californians who are suddenly concerned about the fiscal direction the country is taking and are in danger of straying from the utopian lefty fold that has kept Barbara Boxer in power all this time. The LA Times must calculate that Californians really believe that the supposed “bad old days of back-alley abortions” are just around the corner, and that’s infinitely more frightening than this rumor of state and national bankruptcy, currency devaluation, etc. The bullshit is going to pile higher before November arrives.


9 posted on 06/10/2010 9:51:30 AM PDT by dr_who
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sten
if you came across a person in a coma... would you just kill them?

Oh, Boxer shouldn't be killed, just retired.

10 posted on 06/10/2010 9:54:34 AM PDT by NativeNewYorker (Freepin' Jew Boy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NativeNewYorker

actually, since she is pro-abortion, we can just recycle her and it should be ok with her.


11 posted on 06/10/2010 9:56:45 AM PDT by sten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
Well. That didn't take long.

California's unemployment rate, when you consider the underemployed and discouraged, probably exceeds 20%.

The Central Valley is returning to the desert from whence it came.

California is home to more illegal aliens than any other state and has more than one-third of the nation's welfare cases, again many more than any other state even on a per capita basis.

California has billions, if not trillions, of dollars of unfunded retirement liabilities to current and former public employees.

Public employee unions control the legislature and many city and county governments.

California has not balanced its budget in years, and its infrastructure is deteriorating.

Businesses are leaving the state in droves.

Total state taxes are the highest in the nation.

To all of these problems Babs has no answer because policies she favors have contributed to all of them. So she wants to talk about abortion. How predictable.

Carly would be wise to say that, as a Senator, she will vote to protect and preserve innocent life whenever the issues arises, but that the election is really about the problems created in California by Bab's failed liberal policies.

12 posted on 06/10/2010 10:01:17 AM PDT by p. henry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

The primaries are over in California. The opportunity to elect a conservative to the Senate there is not happening this year. The choices are between a liberal Democrat and a RINO. It is my policy to always vote for the most conservative candidate that has a chance to win the election...and in this case, that means Fiorina. Anything else is a vote for Boxer and the Obama agenda.


13 posted on 06/10/2010 10:03:18 AM PDT by goldfinch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

No doubt the LA Times is in the tank for the unions and Brown. They are doing what they can to control the debate. This will be one article in many as the Times tries to control the talking points.


14 posted on 06/10/2010 10:31:48 AM PDT by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

I assume that Boxer is the FR choice in this one.


15 posted on 06/10/2010 10:34:10 AM PDT by Chi-townChief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freekitty
An article with Boxer body-slamming Fiorina for wanting to overturn Roe v Wade... and you're siding with Boxer.

Brilliant. Terrific way to support the pro-life cause.

16 posted on 06/10/2010 10:38:54 AM PDT by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

When did she say that?

It did not solidify her credentials, which she has none. All it did was discredit political whores within these groups and paint themselves as sell-outs.

The so-called pro-life Carly: “I do not believe where a potential judicial nominee stands on that issue [of abortion rights] is a qualifier or an unqualifier.”

The so-called pro-life Carly: “...(W)hile that is a very important issue, it is frankly a decided issue. The law is clear in the state of California, where there is a constitutional guarantee to the right to an abortion. So why are we talking about a theoretical issue?”

The so-called pro-life Carly who would have signed onto pro-abort Sonya Sotomayer's nomination to the Supreme Court.

These alleged pro-life groups can go to hell along with Carly and Babs Boxer. I will not vote for these whores. And anybody who doesn't like what I say can kiss my posterior.

17 posted on 06/10/2010 10:39:48 AM PDT by CounterCounterCulture
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldfinch

I voted for Chuck DeVore and now I will vote for Fiorina.

Let’s be clear. I would crawl through broken glass under razor wire to pull the switch against Boxer. I have been voting against her since I was 18, and I am 36 now.

Any conservative worth their salt living in California will tell you the same.


18 posted on 06/10/2010 10:47:35 AM PDT by Smogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Smogger

That’s what I’m wondering about - it seems like most are more comfortable ‘rat than RINO.


19 posted on 06/10/2010 11:09:32 AM PDT by Chi-townChief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief

Some people have the “principles.” I guess my distaste for Boxer trumps all of that.


20 posted on 06/10/2010 11:12:18 AM PDT by Smogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson