Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama's Deficit commission may target mortgage deductions (caps on tax breaks for mortgage interest)
Hotair ^ | 06/09/2010 | Ed Morrisey

Posted on 06/09/2010 7:33:20 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last
To: Pining_4_TX

Screw the workers, let them carry the couch potatoes, tax the producers to help the poor renters, etc.. When will we ever get our liberty back? It looks like never.


21 posted on 06/09/2010 8:09:37 PM PDT by Goreknowshowtocheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

“What the heck is so special about interest payments that they should ever have been tax deductible in the first place?”

Well, nothing...and everything.

It depends on what the borrowed money (that generates the interest) is used for. And it depends if the taxing authorities wish to encourage or discourage some types of behavior. In other words, favoritism, at some level.

If the taxing authority = government wishes to encourage home ownership, then mortgage int becomes deductible = favored. In some ways (other than it being a tradition) this makes sense. It encourages families to settle into stable neighborhoods, it encourages builders to build and plumbers to plumb, and these folks get stable jobs and become nice little consumers who, ultimately, spend their tax savings elsewhere. So the gov’t really only defers, it doesn’t forego those taxes. And stable neighborhoods result, with stable people able to work stable jobs and on and on.

If the govt wishes to encourage the update and replacement of aging machinery, then it can offer deductibility on the interest paid on funds used to buy or build the updated gear.

If the gov’t wishes to encourage debauchery, then the gov’t can allow the deductibility of liquor, hookers, and limousines.

It’s no different than saying that “if you tax something, you get less of it”. If you un-tax something, you theoretically get *more* of it. It’s just a matter of what behaviors the gov’t wishes to encourage/discourage today, tomorrow, over time.


22 posted on 06/09/2010 8:11:10 PM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (The United States has become a kakistocracy. Look it up if you doubt it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Calling them “tax entitlements,” senior Democratic lawmakers have argued they should be on the table for reform just like traditional entitlement programs Medicare, Social Security and Medicaid.

Does anybody here seriously believe that democrats have those things "on the table" for cuts?

23 posted on 06/09/2010 8:24:52 PM PDT by Graybeard58 (No Romney,No Mark Kirk (Illinois), not now, not ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Sorry, just another tax break that should be dropped! I really should say another Government subsidy...


24 posted on 06/09/2010 8:26:46 PM PDT by Deagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Attention Surplus Disorder

Sorry, that is not a problem for Government! That does seem to be a problem these days...


25 posted on 06/09/2010 8:28:46 PM PDT by Deagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Deagle
Sorry, just another tax break that should be dropped! I really should say another Government subsidy...

They'll never drop it. They'll only take it away from "the rich" via means-testing. We have to make it pay to be a loser in this country.

26 posted on 06/09/2010 8:38:13 PM PDT by Minipax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Minipax

Of course not! Just another way to rob the rich to pay the poor... (Today’s Robin Hood)...


27 posted on 06/09/2010 8:42:43 PM PDT by Deagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

“I’ve long said that the mortgage interest deduction makes no sense at all. Not only does it drive up the prices of homes, but it gives an incentive for homeowners to stay deep in debt. “

You’re right, but that probably won’t save you from the wrath of angry mortgage-owners.


28 posted on 06/09/2010 8:59:05 PM PDT by Pelham (without Deporting 20 million illegals border control is meaningless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: coaltrain

” Getting rid of it would drive prices down, “

There’s your answer. If the deduction were neutral removing it would have no effect on prices.


29 posted on 06/09/2010 9:03:57 PM PDT by Pelham (without Deporting 20 million illegals border control is meaningless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

“No tax provision is inviolate. I can recall when: all interest, including credit card and installment interest, was deductible; when all medical expenses, without the 7.5% threshold, was deductible; when State sales taxes in addition to other state taxes, were deductible; when business expenses were all deductible without the 2% threshold.”


“I don’t remember when all those things were tax deductible, “

They were deductible prior to 1986.


30 posted on 06/09/2010 9:07:07 PM PDT by Pelham (without Deporting 20 million illegals border control is meaningless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ChiMark

Fanny and Freddy didn’t ‘bankrupt the mortgage industry’ despite a lot of the nonsense that gets repeated around here.


31 posted on 06/09/2010 9:10:06 PM PDT by Pelham (without Deporting 20 million illegals border control is meaningless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Goreknowshowtocheat
You should really think before posting such an ignorant, knee jerk reaction.
I “rent” my housing needs.
Always have, probably always will.
As I pay my rent on time, and maintain the contractual terms of lease agreements, I see very little difference between owning and renting housing, barring two points.
1.If an obnoxious person moves next door to me,or the larger neighborhood changes for the worst, I can easily relocate when my lease expires. The property “owner” obviously can't do the same.
2. I completely understand that the property I rent is not really “mine”, and there exists restrictions regarding my use of it. The property owners I “rent from” rarely seem to “get it” that they also do not ever truly “own” the “property”. Ownership is always contingent on paying the annual taxes on time,abiding by local ordinances, and hoping the government never decides they could make better use of the property than the titular “owner” does.

I prefer to live free of debt.
I, as does everyone, need to live somewhere.
My landlord is actually very happy that I choose to “rent”
my housing needs, as he/she/the corporation needs people like me to provide the funds to pay for the property taxes, so they can continue to “own” the property.
Think about it.

32 posted on 06/09/2010 9:27:06 PM PDT by sarasmom (No incumbent re-elected, at any level of government office.(Period))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: sarasmom

My my...aren’t we judgemental..

I have worked 16 hour days for alot of years. Everytime I think I might get ahead they use the tax code to club me.

Until we get a Fair tax, we will always be slaves to this do gooder tax code. Wouldn’t you really rather be free?


33 posted on 06/09/2010 10:28:44 PM PDT by Goreknowshowtocheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

This is all part of the government’s attempt to destroy families. Cap and trade bill has a tax for selling your home. It also has a provision that sellers must, at their cost, have energy compliant window, doors, roofs and appliances. Take away the interest provision and the housing market will be the final nail in the housing market’s coffin. Real estate will become just another part of the nationalization process.


34 posted on 06/10/2010 2:14:41 AM PDT by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

People love their mortgage interest deduction. It’s probably the only reason most taxpayers get a refund. If this is taken away, it will be the last straw.


35 posted on 06/10/2010 2:42:39 AM PDT by giotto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

when inflation comes, $250,000 will be squat, and we will have all these taxes tied to “the rich” that will really be tied to everyone. More AMT for all.


36 posted on 06/10/2010 3:02:17 AM PDT by Puddleglum ("due to the record harvest, rationing will continue as usual")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pelham

“You’re right, but that probably won’t save you from the wrath of angry mortgage-owners.”

No one likes having the rules changed in the middle of the game - esp not after having made the largest investment of their lives (for most buyers).


37 posted on 06/10/2010 3:05:33 AM PDT by Puddleglum ("due to the record harvest, rationing will continue as usual")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
The popular tax break for mortgage interest, once considered untouchable, is falling under the scrutiny of policymakers and economic experts seeking ways to close huge deficits.

Imagine if Bush had proposed such action - the media would have been in a hate-frenzy. But now, "economic experts" see this as a viable way to close huge deficits. Huge deficits, I may add, that are caused by enormously excessive government spending.

38 posted on 06/10/2010 3:13:22 AM PDT by meyer (Big government is the enemy of freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

It went back to the original tax legislation establishing the income tax.

Way back then, most loans were associated with business. It took until the late 20’s before there were more mortgages on homes/residences than there were on farms. Many farmers had lines of credit with dealers of all sorts, so the tax code allowed deduction of the interest paid on operating loans and other types of credit.

Well, the tax code stayed pretty much the same as America changed; the deductibility of interest paid stayed in the code, even as most interest paid became mortgage debt, auto loan debt, revolving unsecured debt (eg, credit cards). In the Tax Reform Act of 1986, interest for business loans was kept in, but for personal debt, everything but mortgage interest was pulled out.

The bargain that Reagan’s advisors were making back in those days was “Yes, we’re eliminating a LOT of deductions, but we’re lowering your tax rates overall.”


39 posted on 06/10/2010 4:02:19 AM PDT by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Pining_4_TX
I’m a homeowner, but the mortgage interest rate deduction mostly helps the wealthy and real estate agents.

That's a good point, though I'm not sure it helps "the wealthy" all that much. Under the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) most of these deductions disappear and are replaced by a large, fixed personal exemption -- so above a certain income the deductibility of home mortgage interest has no bearing at all.

40 posted on 06/10/2010 4:15:29 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Let the Eastern bastards freeze in the dark.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson