“Blood-thirsty hyperbole aside, you keep forgetting that the order he’s charged with disobeying is his brigade commander’s. Not Obama’s”
It really isn’t hyperbole to the man deploying to the war zone. And i already explained to you why that brigade commander is not the source of that order. You never convinced me that the brigade commander ALONE could launch an invasion of Mexico. Your argument is becoming circular and you appear to be immune to reason, so ill leave you and Obama to agree on your opinion.
You've offered your opinion, nothing else. Unless you include your unique interpretation of the rules of evidence. I've asked for the federal statute, the UCMJ article, or the court decision that supports your claim. I'm still waiting.
You never convinced me that the brigade commander ALONE could launch an invasion of Mexico.
Nobody is claiming he can. Or did. But he is expected to obey his order, and to have his orders obeyed.
Your argument is becoming circular and you appear to be immune to reason...
You've offered none.