>>Stopping your evil agenda of “reproductive fitness”
Evil Agenda?
Recognizing that some behaviors impact long term social and biological health and survival - how is that an “evil agenda”?
“reproductive fitness” is just a formalized study of what is reproductively healthy, and what isn’t.
Obviously, being unable to identify a correct-sexed member of the same species with whom to procreate would be rather reproductively UNhealthy.
Likewise, the inability to maintain long term male-female reproductive relationships, observable in the high divorce rate and multiple generations of dysfunctional latch-key children, is UNHEALTHY.
There is a plethora of reproductively related behaviors which have contributed to the loss of the cultural war, and the accelerated destruction of this nations moral (and financial) infrastructures....
Or haven’t you noticed that “sex sells”?
What you are advocating has been done before and it is evil.
“reproductive fitness” is just a formalized study of what is reproductively healthy, and what isn’t.
It is nothing more than eugenics relabeled.
Likewise, the inability to maintain long term male-female reproductive relationships, observable in the high divorce rate and multiple generations of dysfunctional latch-key children, is UNHEALTHY.
Here comes the selective breeding.
There is a plethora of reproductively related behaviors which have contributed to the loss of the cultural war, and the accelerated destruction of this nations moral (and financial) infrastructures....
We've heard this before.
Or haven’t you noticed that “sex sells”?
You're pushing evil.