Like most trolls you have a serious problem with projection.
What exactly do you thing "reproductive fitness" is if not a form of eugenics?
Like most trolls, it’s playing the semantics game.
Change definitions in the middle of discussions, make up definitions to suit yourself, whatever.
At all costs, hide your true agenda with the definition game and if anyone comes close to ripping off the mask, attack them.
>>”reproductive fitness” is if not a form of eugenics?
Reproductive fitness is merely the measurement of a genome’s ability to produce viable offspring. Typically measured over multiple generations.
It could apply to plants as well as animals.
Maybe in your Parrot’s Newspeak Dictionary, Gregor Mendel was a “Eugenicist” when he was measuring viability of (genetic) traits among Pea plants.... but in the real world, he was just a horticultural scientist (and an Augustinian priest) trying to figure out why some plants produced better/more fruit than others.
In other, more modern, words he was measuring Reproductive Fitness of Peas.