Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wagglebee

>>So, eugenics isn’t that deadly?

Observing, measuring, and recognizing the effects of behavior upon reproductive fitness is not “Eugenics”.

But you go ahead and keep clinging to that straw raft.


107 posted on 06/09/2010 12:34:55 PM PDT by LomanBill (Animals! The DemocRats blew up the windmill with an Acorn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]


To: LomanBill; Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus; metmom; xzins; P-Marlowe; rhema; Dr. Brian Kopp; trisham; ..
Observing, measuring, and recognizing the effects of behavior upon reproductive fitness is not “Eugenics”.

Yes, I know it is such a fine and lofty intellectual ideal and the participants will argue incessantly that they aren't practicing eugenics (after all, eugenics has such negative connotations).

And then one day, one of these fine, upstanding people who observe, measure and reproductive fitness will reach the conclusion that, "Three generations of imbeciles are enough."

108 posted on 06/09/2010 12:42:02 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson