Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bred in the bone? (Study suggests children have a sense of morality at a very young age)
WORLD ^ | June 19, 2010 | Janie B. Cheaney

Posted on 06/09/2010 6:20:24 AM PDT by rhema

Years ago, when our daughter attended a church- sponsored preschool, we were invited to an informal meeting about parenting techniques. After orientation by the school director, we broke into discussion groups. The topic was discipline, a burning issue for preschool parents, swerving naturally to "How do we teach them right from wrong?" One father in our group apparently wanted to stir the pot. Early in the conversation he asked, "But how do we know what's right and wrong? Do those words have any meaning?"

If he was hoping for a Socratic discussion he didn't get it, neither the first time nor the second time he asked. No one even challenged the premise. I didn't know the man: He might have been an amateur student of philosophy, or a Hindu, or just a provocateur. But to parents of preschoolers, the question itself was meaningless. We all had some notion of right and wrong that we sought to inculcate in our young barbarians; the only issue was how.

New research indicates parents may have a little underlying cooperation in that quest. I mean "little" literally. "The Moral Life of Babies," appearing in The New York Times Magazine last month, outlines extensive study by Yale University researchers into the degree that right and wrong is recognized by children as young as a few months. Surprisingly or not, overwhelming evidence points to a sense of morality either inborn or developing very early.

The study involved babies being exposed to mini-dramas, both live and on film. Two puppets or two shapes were shown either helping or hindering a third character, with the babies encouraged afterward to respond. The youngest subjects were capable of nothing but watching, so their response was measured by how long they looked. But 9- to 12-month-olds could register approval or disapproval in a variety of ways, including punishing the bad actors when they had an opportunity. "In the end," writes professor Paul Bloom, "we found that 6- and 10-month-old infants [in a given study] overwhelmingly preferred the helpful individual to the hindering individual. This wasn't a subtle statistical trend; just about all the babies reached for the good guy."

The overwhelming response among the public: interesting. Writes Albert Mohler on his blog, "Does the fact that infants have an innate moral sense underline the importance of the fact that human beings are made in God's own image? It would certainly seem so." Meanwhile, a fan of atheist Richard Dawkins, commenting on Dawkins' website, draws quite another conclusion: "This will be a rather bitter blow to the religious who are convinced that humans are born sinful [and] incapable of telling right from wrong without moral guidance from the bible. . . . What a delicious laugh."

Not so fast. Paul says that even those without the Mosaic Law nonetheless have God's law written on their hearts, "while their conscience also bears witness" (Romans 2:14-15). While babies can't acknowledge the first table of the Law (loving God), the second table, about loving their neighbor, seems firmly fixed. Why?

The evolutionary bias assumed by the researchers can only shrug. Conceivably, a strong sense of group sympathy can help an individual survive in a harsh environment, but what explains the babies' apparent sympathy for animal puppets? Dr. Bloom admits that "the morality of contemporary humans really does outstrip what evolution could possibly have endowed us with." And there's another, rather obvious problem: "If children enter the world already equipped with moral notions, why is it that we have to work so hard to humanize them?"

That's the conundrum C.S. Lewis addresses in the first section of Mere Christianity: (a) everyone seems to have a sense of moral law, and (b) everyone breaks it. The little one who shows sorrow for a thwarted puppet will likely knock down a smaller child someday, or snatch a toy, or lie on a resumé, or cheat on his income tax, and natural selection will not justify him. Someone else will have to.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: albertmohler; cslewis; moralabsolutes; richarddawkins
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-187 next last
To: valkyry1
>>Texas?? Why are bringing Texas up
 
Because Texan religionists have altered public school curriculum to teach the lie that that the American Founders intended this to be a Christian Nation.
 
They even tried to toss Jefferson himself out of the curriculum.
 
Was Thomas Jefferson a Founder?  Yes he was.
Were the "great Majority" of his contemporaries Founders?  Yes, they were.
 
Did they intend to create a Christian Theocracy?
"Where the preamble declares, that coercion is a departure from the plan of the holy author of our religion, an amendment was proposed by inserting "Jesus Christ," so that it would read "A departure from the plan of Jesus Christ, the holy author of our religion;" the insertion was rejected by the great majority, in proof that they meant to comprehend, within the mantle of its protection, the Jew and the Gentile, the Christian and Mohammedan, the Hindoo and Infidel of every denomination."
-Thomas Jefferson, Autobiography, in reference to the Virginia Act for Religious Freedom
 
http://www.history1700s.com/etext/html/texts/jefferson/jeff1.txt
 
NO.
 
Will they be teaching that FACT in the Texas Curriculum, or just the facts deemed "conservative" by the religionist RINO Theocrats? 
 
 
What about Sharia Law, when the demographics change sufficiently for it to be mandated by the majority?   Allow one, gotta allow all - Just ask the religionists at the Air Force Academy who now have a Wiccan circle on grounds.... thanks to other religionists shoving their foot through the 1st amendment door/wall and creating precedence.

161 posted on 06/09/2010 7:25:19 PM PDT by LomanBill (Animals! The DemocRats blew up the windmill with an Acorn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: Diggity

Sounds good.


162 posted on 06/09/2010 8:14:54 PM PDT by stuartcr (Everything happens as God wants it to...otherwise, things would be different)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Truthsearcher

I think many people throughout history, consider what’s right, differently.


163 posted on 06/09/2010 8:15:59 PM PDT by stuartcr (Everything happens as God wants it to...otherwise, things would be different)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

Is that sinful or just our nature?


164 posted on 06/09/2010 8:16:45 PM PDT by stuartcr (Everything happens as God wants it to...otherwise, things would be different)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: LomanBill

???


165 posted on 06/09/2010 8:17:45 PM PDT by stuartcr (Everything happens as God wants it to...otherwise, things would be different)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr

Nature reflects Biblical law.


166 posted on 06/09/2010 8:22:18 PM PDT by LomanBill (Animals! The DemocRats blew up the windmill with an Acorn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

>>if you’re trying to sell moral subjectivism

Subjectivism - only to the degree that we can observe confirmation in Creation (especially including human societies) that when God’s law and Truth is discarded, there is an inevitable, consequential, result.


167 posted on 06/09/2010 8:37:12 PM PDT by LomanBill (Animals! The DemocRats blew up the windmill with an Acorn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: LomanBill

How is that known? Perhaps biblical law is written to take advantage of certain human traits/nature, in order to present a set of laws or directives.


168 posted on 06/09/2010 8:37:16 PM PDT by stuartcr (Everything happens as God wants it to...otherwise, things would be different)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr
>>How is that known?
 
Not so much known, as believed - I think.  That's where the Faith part comes in.
 
Christian Faith, being the work-product of spiritual interaction with the Creator via our life experiences within His Word.
 
In the Beginning was the Word... and the Word was God.
 
I find it quite compelling that a bunch of sheep herders were able to articulate a simple model of primal creation so congruent to the modern quantum cosmology model or "big bang".
 
There was nothing, and a moment later - all the energy that formed the universe, was.
 
The Genesis account is simpler:  "Let there be Light".
 
I believe a single cell in my hand is vastly more complex than the watch upon my wrist.  For me, the workings and order of the universe compel a belief in a watch-maker; and not one that is blind.
 
Having accepted a Creator, I was then naturally drawn into the process of trying to understand Him better.  For me, the Triune God of Christianity facilitates that process better than any other.
 
Father - the Creator beyond space, time, and the physical nature of the universe.
Son - the Creator in physical form.
Holy Spirit - the Creator facilitating interaction between the physical and non-physical.
 
{yes I know the tale of Osiris is very similar}
 
 
In any event, those are my beliefs - and I could be wrong; so what right could I possibly claim for coercing others into accepting them as irrefutable.... as religionist apparatchiks are so often observably, and dangerously, prone to do? 
 
Let folks see the evidence for themselves, and make up their own Free Minds.  That's what I think Americans were supposed to do.

169 posted on 06/09/2010 9:31:44 PM PDT by LomanBill (Animals! The DemocRats blew up the windmill with an Acorn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: LomanBill

So what is to be done about conflicting beliefs? If laws are based on beliefs, but not knowledge/facts, why should someone with a dfferent belief, be held responsible to a law based on a beliefe he does not hold?

I agree on making up our own minds. Thanks


170 posted on 06/09/2010 9:53:52 PM PDT by stuartcr (Everything happens as God wants it to...otherwise, things would be different)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr
[why should someone with a different belief, be held responsible to a law based on a beliefe he does not hold?]
 
That is an essential element of the Virginia Act for Religious Freedom:
"...that to compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of [religious] opinions which he disbelieves, is sinful and tyrannical"
http://religiousfreedom.lib.virginia.edu/sacred/vaact.html
 
Beyond the scope of religious belief, however, my answer to your question is that a Republic is a system of governance characterized by the Rule of Law; and when the Law fails - the Republic fails.
 
Our American Republic is a great compromise between a variety of conflicting opinions regarding how to best effect "Government Of the People, By the People, For the People".   The laws that are in place are supposed to be the result of representative legislation under Constitutional governance.   They aren't, always - and the remedy to this is the deliberately SLOW process of judicial appeal - all the way to the Supreme Court.
 
Additionaly, if you don't like a law, you can try to change it by gathering a consensus among your peers through the exercise of free discourse - with a collective voice in the ear of your elected representatives.  
 
It's not perfect, but is there a better system on Earth?

171 posted on 06/09/2010 11:54:48 PM PDT by LomanBill (Animals! The DemocRats blew up the windmill with an Acorn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr
Is that sinful or just our nature?

Both.

172 posted on 06/10/2010 6:23:11 AM PDT by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (We bury Democrats face down so that when they scratch, they get closer to home.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: LomanBill

Not that I know of.


173 posted on 06/10/2010 6:31:45 AM PDT by stuartcr (Everything happens as God wants it to...otherwise, things would be different)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

That’s good, it covers both those that believe in sin, and those that don’t.


174 posted on 06/10/2010 6:35:03 AM PDT by stuartcr (Everything happens as God wants it to...otherwise, things would be different)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr
That’s good, it covers both those that believe in sin, and those that don’t.

It is also an answer that is completely in accord with the doctrine of the sin nature. When man fell, his stewardship over the earth also fell, bringing the entire created world - man's society or natural world - under that same curse. 2nd law of thermodynamics, etc. etc.

175 posted on 06/10/2010 6:55:42 AM PDT by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (We bury Democrats face down so that when they scratch, they get closer to home.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

That’s a good belief.


176 posted on 06/10/2010 7:17:40 AM PDT by stuartcr (Everything happens as God wants it to...otherwise, things would be different)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr

Well Stuart, you know that everything happens as God wants it to...otherwise, things would be different, right?


177 posted on 06/10/2010 7:19:57 AM PDT by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (We bury Democrats face down so that when they scratch, they get closer to home.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

Yes, like I said, it covers the bases.


178 posted on 06/10/2010 5:53:46 PM PDT by stuartcr (Everything happens as God wants it to...otherwise, things would be different)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

Don’t see how it could be different. Thanks, I don’t get quoted often.


179 posted on 06/10/2010 5:55:19 PM PDT by stuartcr (Everything happens as God wants it to...otherwise, things would be different)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr
Don’t see how it could be different. Thanks, I don’t get quoted often.

Did you like how I artfully weaved your name into the Scooby Doo song the other day?

180 posted on 06/11/2010 5:56:42 AM PDT by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (We bury Democrats face down so that when they scratch, they get closer to home.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-187 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson