Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pissant

I don’t actually see any cleavage in that picture. The shirt isn’t that low cut. The left really stretches don’t they?


179 posted on 06/09/2010 2:18:01 AM PDT by JaguarXKE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: JaguarXKE
The left really stretches don’t they?

So does Sarah, but in her case it's natural for her to stretch that shirt, and quite attractive. It's also irrelevant and a lib attempt to reduce her to a pretty face. The Dixie Chicks were, at their best, reasonably attractive superficially, but in their case it was exclusively skin deep and real Americans shunned them.

What they don't realize is that we looked beyond Sarah's surface beauty before conservatives decided to support her. If Palin was only average looking, we'd still be thrilled to have her as a national leader. What I care about is that she believes in the First Amendment, and she really means it. She's pro-life, and she lives her beliefs. She's patriotic in her heart and not just when the cameras are rolling. She supports the Second Amendment, not for political reasons but because it is one of her many fundamental values. She opposes corruption in both parties and has proven that throughout her career. She's a genuine leader and experienced executive, beloved by both sides of the political isle until her nomination threatened the scheduled coronation of King Barack the First.

Or is there anyone who can look at the pictures of her hunting/shooting and question her support for our fundamental rights?

Is there anyone who can look at the two "inconvenient" babies (the classic lib examples "you'd support abortion if your 'fetus' had Downs" and ". . . if your unmarried teenage daughter was pregnant" combined with ". . . if it wasn't the right time for your career") that joined her family over the last 26 months and question her pro-life values?

Is there anyone who can look at the pictures of her with our troops and with her oldest son and question her views on our military?

Palin has been vetted far more thoroughly and viciously than Obama or anyone else in history, and the fact is that she is the cleanest candidate we are likely to see in our lives. I'm not a mindless Palin-bot (and I doubt there are as many of those as her detractors claim). I'd be happy to vote for an even better candidate. I just have seen no sign that we have a better candidate, who could both win and govern well, available in this generation.


187 posted on 06/09/2010 6:27:48 AM PDT by Pollster1 (Natural born citizen of the USA, with the birth certificate to prove it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson