Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: blam
If Laffer's thesis about tax cuts is valid, why did the U.S. economy record the weakest period of economic expansion following the Bush tax cuts of 2001 and 2003?

9/11 mean anything to these fools?

4 posted on 06/07/2010 7:45:17 PM PDT by Last Dakotan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Last Dakotan

9/11? Whuzat?


5 posted on 06/07/2010 7:46:39 PM PDT by null and void (We are now in day 501 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Last Dakotan

The fact that we came back so quickly from 9/11 is truly a testament to the greatness of this country


32 posted on 06/07/2010 8:11:23 PM PDT by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Last Dakotan

Despite the headlines, the Bush tax cuts frankly were rather puny for ordinary Americans (except large investors in dividend-bearing stocks and a few other politically favored categories). The tremendous malinvestment attendant to the dot-com bubble (peaked 1999) took some time to unwind. People sank huge amounts of money in non-profitable Internet ventures and relied upon the presumption that those investments would not diminish in worth. The economy has been in long-term decline since the 1973 oil bust (seriously).

The economy of 1999-2005 featured all of the following maladies:

* Bursts of price inflation, occasionally severe in 2000 and 2004/2005, interspersed with a period of cratering prices in 2001/2002.
* Energy crises, especially in California, which lacks adequate electricity, and the oil production ceiling in 2004/2005, and in natural gas in the unusually frigid 2000/2001 winter.
* Corporate accounting scandals and scandalously complicated legislation ostensibly intended to prevent them
* Restructuring of employment and skills of the labor force after the end of the dot-com bubble.
* The maturation of the Internet as a communication and commercial tool.
* Upheaval in the telecommunications sector, largely resulting from the Internet revolution and the popping of the dot-com bubble.
* Escalating costs in the overwhelmingly government-controlled education and health-care sectors.

The following factors, then evident, still now continue to drive the economy toward semi-permanent stagnation:
* Increasingly emasculating regulatory state, drastically curtailing industrial production, masked in the 1990s by the dot-com bubble with growth in largely unregulated technologies.
* Demographic trends, especially a lack of children and an excess of elderly. This factor proves especially severe in certain parts of the country. An increasing, youthful population provides a natural mechanism for economic expansion. As children age, they marry, procreate, and form new households, driving demand for goods and services. The elderly, however, increasingly exit the free-market system and find themselves in Medicare and Social Security.


58 posted on 06/07/2010 9:23:11 PM PDT by dufekin (Name our lead enemy: Islamic Republic of Iran, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Islamofascist terrorist dictator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Last Dakotan
If Laffer's thesis about tax cuts is valid, why did the U.S. economy record the weakest period of economic expansion following the Bush tax cuts of 2001 and 2003?

9/11 mean anything to these fools?

For a split second I started to slam in with that intuitive comment. Then I thought I would probably be jumping in really late with this masterfully obvious thought.

61 posted on 06/08/2010 12:05:44 AM PDT by higgmeister ( In the Shadow of The Big Chicken!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson