[Deb]

Yeah, right. No on wants legalization. You just want the laws against drug use abolished or unenforced. That's all. Well, like Bill Clinton, the Socialists in the White House right now, will be happy to accommodate the Libertarian wet dream of non-enforcement.

It beats me what you're all whining about. Federal drug enforcement barely exists. Go home and stay stoned. Please. The sooner you all destroy your brains, the better off everyone else will be.

[subterfuge]

Okay, I’m going to go ahead and put you down as a jack-boot there Deb. You see, you are a moron. Show me anywhere where I said I don’t want drug laws enforced and I’ll take it back, but you won’t, so I won’t. You want to equate me with Bill Clinton? F*CK YOU. You’re idea of freedom is a lot closer to what both Clintons want than me or any real FReeper.

I’m guessing your real problem is you can’t get a man. Yeah, thats probably it.

[spacewarp]

Deb, and the rest,

I’m not a drug user. Never have. Never smoked. Drank alcohol once in my lifetime to celebrate something. Won’t do it again.

I am also a cancer survivor.

Was there pot available for me to help with the nausea? Yes. Did I partake? No.

Now, from my perspective, and believe me, if you haven’t been there, you have no clue what you’re talking about, if there’s a way to help that, and you can bring yourself to do something to help, then you want that available.

A simple take is not “legalization” but to take it out of the fed’s hands. If California wants to have pot houses, so be it. If Nevada wants full heroin bars, that’s their choice. If Utah wants to ban it, that’s their choice. But, NO FEDERAL INVOLVEMENT.