Posted on 06/06/2010 1:52:39 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
Joel’s voice is now totally shot. Decades of alcholol and tobacco abuse have taken their toll. In his prime he was a versatile vocalist for someone with no training.
This just in: conservative icon Rush Limbaugh can look past one’s personal sins and accept the person... or maybe he just enjoys Elton John’s talent.
Liberal diversity-loving Reporters at a loss.
Elton will get dissed for this
some will applaud him taking Satan’s money
She gets pregnant.
I guarantee it.
You go big guy.
I like Elton from Yeller Brick Road backwards...early was good...very different for it’s day when it came out...my HS years
Do you like the 1990’s Disney version of Elton John ? You know, THE LION KING ?
RE: She gets pregnant.
I guarantee it.
You go big guy.
Did Rush not adopt a kid ? I’m sure I heard this from somewhere...
What happened to that chick he was dating from CNN???????????
I’m not familiar with it...my now nearly grown oldest kids were though
I think my three youngest might know him too from some modern works
I like stuff like:
Leave-On
Madman
Rocket man
Tiny Dancer
Texas Love Song
most of the stuff before we knew he was so queenie...when he was a scraggly guy behind a piano..before the glitter and big glasses...before Stigwood and Carr
Taupin married a girl from Vicksburg and Elton sorta moved into flambeau turf at the same time...76 or so
He is talented no doubt but dang so queened up...good thing he;s cuter than Harvey Fierstein
didn’t his guitarist die?
Davey something?
Well , I’d like to know what happened to good old Martha ?
They looked so in loved the last time I saw them...
One of the best concerts I ever saw was Elton in the late 70s in Frankfurt. Ray Cooper was his only accompanyist, and they rocked the house.
If I had Rush's dough, I could see myself inviting Elton, Rush (the group), the Stones, etc. Heck, I could see myself having a concert with nothing but movie bands: Strange Fruit (Still Crazy), Spinal Tap, Steel Dragon (Rock Star), and The Wonders (That Thing You Do).
Just to pi$$ off my wife, I'd bring in Spyrogyra. One of the best concerts ever, but she told me she hated it, 20 years after the fact.
Hell, I'm broke, so it's just a pipe dream.
not that i know of
There aren't any conservative singers that could have performed?
And, I know Rush has money but blowing a million on Elton John when it could have gone to a charity also says something about his lifestyle.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1252081/Elton-John-claims-Jesus-super-intelligent-gay-man-U-S-magazine-interview.html
Elton John claims Jesus was a 'super-intelligent gay man' in U.S. magazine interview
He claims to be a Christian and has no problem paying off someone like John that has blasphemed Jesus Christ? That says a lot about Rush's priorities and spiritual state.
You don't understand if that is what it takes for someone to have sex with you, the relationship isn't rooted in love and ISN'T GOING TO LAST?
And, nothing wrong with those that blaspheme Jesus Christ as John did just a few months ago.
Let's not forgot, pro-abortion, pro-homosexual Rudy Giuliani was also invited.
What conservative wouldn't rather hire someone with similar talent that has similar values at one of the most important events of one's life?
Did you see that Rush has bought into the hoax that homosexuality is biological:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=159285
I found myself reflecting on the moral and intellectual confusion that bedevils this subject as I read, in the same article that reports his fears, that Rush Limbaugh "regards homosexuality as, most probably, biologically determined." The article goes on to say that "while he opposes gay marriage as culturally subversive, he has no problem with gay civil unions."
Does anyone really understand what it means to say that homosexuality is biologically determined? All the physical reactions we associate with human sexuality have a biological basis. But does this mean that they are no longer a matter of human choice and responsibility? People talk as if sexual preferences are like skin color, matters determined by natural processes beyond the control of the individual. But if this is true, why is only the homosexual preference removed from the realm of moral responsibility, and not the preference for children, or animals or violent sexual assault?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.