Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cripplecreek

Analyzing Newts suggestions given what has happened in the past is important. Newt reacts to the problems created by the Left’s Marxist “progress”. In that reaction, he proposes “private public partnerships” as the althernative which was a great idea until the private partnership aspect was powerful enough in public affairs to shake down the treasury! My point is, reaction to Marxist oppression is Fascist oppression. Either way, we lose freedom.

Another example: Newt says people getting unemployment checks should have to do something in return...like getting out on the street and reporting crime. Can anyone say a Newt solution setting up the structure for Obama’s political shock troops? Newt touts Tommy Thompson’s welfare “reform.” Well, this is where politicans launched their current corrupt relationships with employers of welfare folks in return for favors from government.

Let’s do it a third way - a return to the structure and original intent of the constitution in reaction to Marxism. That way Marxists can not exist because they will lack the centralized power to exist and we do not have to react with looking to corrupt corporate CEO’s to “save” us from the commies and socialists.


40 posted on 06/05/2010 9:10:34 AM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: SaraJohnson

Just seems to me that he’s simply spouting the Main Street republican line.


41 posted on 06/05/2010 9:13:51 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson