Posted on 06/04/2010 5:37:40 AM PDT by Kaslin
Last month, in what can only be described as a cowardly criminal act, some unknown person or persons crept into the Mojave Desert under cover of darkness and hacked down a memorial cross honoring veterans. Now, someone is attempting to take credit for the act, and yet, as if to cement their cowardice, doing so anonymously. Here is a simple truth the perpetrators—whoever they are—will never understand: Their actions will not discourage those among us in this fight. To the contrary, it makes us more determined to stay the course.
The particular memorial, first erected by the Veterans of Foreign Wars in 1934, has been the subject of intense litigation over the past decade. The case ended up in the U.S. Supreme Court, which rejected the claim of an “offended” individual and ruled in favor of the the Department of Justice and veterans organizations.
It was a profound victory honoring both ideals and common sense, but what the ACLU could not achieve in court, others tried to accomplish through criminal stealth. The cross memorial may have been desecrated, but the persons responsible have not “won.” Their peculiar brand of intolerance has already backfired, and the ideals they attempted to destroy will emerge even stronger.
The Supreme Court‘s majority decision strongly affirmed that religious symbols are a cherished part of our culture. A memorial cross is by no means an “establishment of religion,” the preposterous claim of the ACLU lawsuit. Mere common sense and experience teach us this. For example, when you drive past a roadside cross with flowers, what is your first thought? Is it that some person is seeking to establish the Christian religion in America, or is it that a loved one tragically perished and now others are crying out symbolically in mourning and remembrance? It takes the staggering, thin-skinned hypersensitivity of the most easily offended to imagine anything other than the latter.
The desecration of this memorial took place at night, so the perpetrators were hidden from view. That’s a fitting symbol for this sad story. The lawyer representing the offended plaintiff noted during argument that the cross could be cut down, the land transferred back to the VFW, and then the cross replaced. As if recalling the words of Aesop, who once noted, “Beware that you do not lose the substance by grasping at the shadow,” Chief Justice John Roberts called the lawyer’s suggestion and “empty ritual” and said, “The Constitution deals with substance, not shadows.”
Justice Anthony Kennedy’s words in the majority decision addressing the substance become even more significant after this astonishing act:
“(The Latin cross) is a symbol often used to honor and respect those whose heroic acts, noble contributions, and patient striving help secure an honored place in history for this nation and its people. Here, one Latin cross in the desert evokes far more than religion. It evokes thousands of small crosses in foreign fields marking the graves of Americans who fell in battles, battles whose tragedies are compounded if the fallen are forgotten.”
I have no doubt the veterans who maintain that hallowed plot of land will rebuild the memorial. That majestic and simple cross stands for something that cannot be destroyed by deeds under cover of darkness. It stands for principles the ACLU and its allies do not understand and ideals that tower over one person’s alleged “offense.” Those principles embody the very heart and soul of those who gave their lives to defend this nation and preserve our freedoms.
American’s veterans, including those with The American Legion and the VFW, are engaged and enraged. The actions intended to end this dispute have given new life and greater urgency to those who honor our fallen heroes in time-honored tradition.
bttt
Ten more crosses that are larger should be erected and a watch posted. Perhaps a website like blueservo.com could have people watch it on the Internet and alert officials if any vandals try anything.
And last year a Christian activist in Illinois thought he could just take down a public atheist sign.
I actually agree that the sign’s placement was in poor taste, but you get the point.
ahh.. no i don’t think i get your point
When people feel strongly about things they tend to take matters into their own hands.
We have a problem on both sides where people forget we are Americans first, and that means getting along with others in our little melting pot, and letting it slide when other people expressing their heart-felt beliefs offends you.
I feel strongly that your statement is incorrect.
What's one of the biggest religion-related problems we have today? That the Muslims get offended by everything and go as far as riot and murder to stop the perceived offense. Whoever took out this cross, that guy in Illinois, same thing, just less severe.
In other words, who cares if a cross or an atheist sign, Mohammed drawing, or a Wiccan pentacle offends you? Having to put up with offense is one of the prices we pay for living in a land of religious freedom.
i feel sorry for your lack of understanding
Enlighten me, oh wise one.
You are attempting to create a moral equivalancy between Christians and muslims?
Seesh, you are so ignorant that you will not be able to respond intelligently, so there is no need for you to respond, I am posting this for others.
Methinks thou art a bit paranoid. I am creating an equivalency between anyone who is fanatical enough about religion to break the law, violate another's rights, or harm another. Once you go that far, it's only a matter of degree. Destroy a cross, take down a display, kick women out of public religious services, deadly riots in the streets -- same concept, different levels of manifestation of intolerance, none of which this country should allow.
Those practicing the intolerance need to either stop it or move to a place besides America where that is welcome, a country where there is no religious freedom.
Seesh, you are so ignorant that you will not be able to respond intelligently
Irony: An unintelligent, personally insulting post accusing the other of not being able to respond intelligently.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.