Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Wonder Warthog

It’s interesting listening to all you “experts” but the oil, however much of it, is still flowing into the sea.
I say remove that stupid BP riser, cut it clean off flush with the bottom. The pipe is 20 inches in diameter? Or so i heard.
I do know something about torpedoes, sea pressure, salinity and make up of the ocean’s bottom and its strata. A Mk 50 torpedo is very close to circumference of the pipe. Send an inert Mk 50, with laser GPS at high speed straight down the throat of that sucker.
It could go into or push the pipe well below the bottom. Follow it with a Mk 48 ADCAP (again w/o warhead) straight in behind it. Use underwater concrete to plug the 3o foot deep, 3 foot wide hole. I guarantee there would be less oil flowing than what I see now


121 posted on 06/04/2010 8:22:26 AM PDT by Rainwaves (Rianwaves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies ]


To: Rainwaves
The casing is some 20 inches but the drill pipe is only 6 inches.

You can't cut the BOP off the well head as it is the well head. It is nearly 5 stories high and anchored to the ocean floor.

You could put a nuclear bomb under it and all you would get for your trouble after the oil made it's way through the sand and debris, would be a lot of radioactive tar balls to pick up off the beach along with radioactive dead birds and fish.

124 posted on 06/04/2010 10:15:30 AM PDT by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies ]

To: Rainwaves
"I guarantee there would be less oil flowing than what I see now.."

Yeah, right. Another "nuke the well" idiot. The probability is quite high that an explosion would actually make things worse.

142 posted on 06/05/2010 6:07:05 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson