Circumstantial evidence is often the best and most compelling evidence.
“Circumstantial evidence is often the best and most compelling evidence.”
It pleases me no end that you are not my lawyer. Circumstantial evidence is frequently merely coincidental.
This is a good example:
You know that lines were busy between a phone to Folks (?) and Haley.
1. Was Folks on one end of the line?
2. Was Haley on the other end or was the other end manned by a staffer?
3. Was this a campaign phone or her personal phone?
4. What exactly was discussed?
All unkowns, yet you have decided that she is guilty of something or other. I will repeat, go work on a tough campaign first and then get back to us. This is not at all unusual for a pol.
Business practice has nothing to do with it.