Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democratic Senate Candidate: White House Floated Possible Jobs... (Romanoff)
ABC News ^ | 6/2/2010 | Jake Tapper and the ABC News Team

Posted on 06/02/2010 7:14:18 PM PDT by Yossarian

Andrew Romanoff, the former speaker of the Colorado house of representatives, issued a statement Wednesday evening claiming that the White House raised the possibility that he might be offered an administration job if he opted to not challenge incumbent Sen. Michael Bennet, D-Colo.

Romanoff also released what he said was an e-mail from White House deputy chief of staff Jim Messina outlining three possible jobs -- deputy assistant administrator for Latin America and Caribbean for the U.S. Agency for International Development; director of the Office of Democracy and Governance at USAID; and director of the U.S. Trade and Development Agency – he could have if he didn’t run.

Romanoff did not accept any of the offers, and currently is challenging Bennet, who has the endorsement of President Obama.

The White House did not comment. The statement comes as the White House attempts to distance itself from the controversy stemming from attempts – also unsuccessful – to convince Rep. Joe Sestak, D-Pa., to not challenge Sen. Arlen Specter, D-Pa., in the Pennsylvania primary. Sestak ultimately defeated Specter.

(rest snipped, read at link)

(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.abcnews.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Colorado
KEYWORDS: jimmessina; messina; obama; romanoff; usaid
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last
To: Yossarian

Thank you for posting again. It does not matter how many times it is Posted, as many people don’t sit here all day and read. <P.

This is the first I’ve seen this.


21 posted on 06/02/2010 7:37:52 PM PDT by annieokie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Yossarian

Just tired of reading the same four ‘stories’ every day on FR.

And, paying for it.

That’s all.


22 posted on 06/02/2010 7:39:40 PM PDT by ButThreeLeftsDo (Are You Ready?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch
Looking forward to President Biden.

Biden, like Hillary!, currently look better because they have the freedom right now to not carry the water for all the Democrat's leftist causes.

However, make either of them the top dog, and I'm sure we'll soon find out that the Democrat's troubles go far past the current occupant in the White House and rather to their general philosophy. (Ah, when unchecked by a GOP legislature, ala Bubba '94-'00, that is.)

23 posted on 06/02/2010 7:47:54 PM PDT by Yossarian (A pro-life democrat is one who holds out for something in return for his pro-abortion vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Yossarian

O/T, but every time I see this at the top of the Breaking News bar, I get an inexplicable craving for noodles made with cheddar cheese and sour cream with a quick dash of Worcestershire Sauce....


24 posted on 06/02/2010 7:50:52 PM PDT by Cyber Liberty (Build a man a fire; he'll be warm for a night. Set a man on fire; he'll be warm the rest of his life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yossarian
Romanoff had been giving the silent treatment on this, being a good party soldier even while he is challenging Obama's candidate. The Denver Post just ran an editorial calling on him to disclose what really happened. He's has a Mr. Clean image, so I guess he decided he didn't want to be accused of being part of a coverup.

Pretty smart politics. Now, Dems can't accuse him of disclosing this to discredit Bennet as being part of corrupt Washington, noooooo, the biggest paper in the state made him do it.

25 posted on 06/02/2010 7:52:01 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yossarian

There is a cancer on the presidency.
This goes all the way to the top.
The only questions that now remain are what did the President know, and when did he know it?


26 posted on 06/02/2010 7:52:07 PM PDT by counterpunch (GOP: Government's Other Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Yossarian

27 posted on 06/02/2010 7:54:28 PM PDT by Oceander (The Price of Freedom is Eternal Vigilance -- Thos. Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yossarian

Don’t listen to them. This story is not the same source as the other.


28 posted on 06/02/2010 7:54:53 PM PDT by Cyber Liberty (Build a man a fire; he'll be warm for a night. Set a man on fire; he'll be warm the rest of his life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch
Looking forward to President Biden.
He may be an idiot, but at least he’s not stridently anti-Israel.

And he makes me genuinely laugh. And his wife knows how to dress nice.

29 posted on 06/02/2010 7:59:02 PM PDT by Fudd Fan (I LOVE SARAH PALIN! HOW ABOUT THEM APPLES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Yossarian

When was Hillary offered the SOS job?


30 posted on 06/02/2010 7:59:02 PM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo
Just tired of reading the same four ‘stories’ every day on FR.

Huh? I thought this was the first post with the email from the White House.

31 posted on 06/02/2010 8:00:26 PM PDT by NotSoModerate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: OrangeHoof

Yes. I wondered that before when Sestak hit the news (even though he is a sitting member in the house). And apparently it is illegal to offer gov’t jobs to people in order to influence an election.

Basically this is a law because they don’t want the party in power using gov’t jobs to allow the party to run people unopposed in the primary. So that way they won’t spend money in the primary and create an internal feud within the party...instead all the money goes to fund their “annoited” pick. It’s actually a very good law to have on the books—I’m surprised it exists.

The rats must have passed it when the white house was in control by Republicans and they wanted to not allow them to use the gov’t jobs in the same way they have always done. But now they forget about that law when they are back in power.


32 posted on 06/02/2010 8:06:14 PM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker

I think he’s doing it to get the White House to stop backing Bennet. The only way he keeps his mouth shut or changes his story is to win the primary. He thinks the WH is vulnerable due to Sestak and is capitalizing on it.

Good for us, but it doesn’t make him a good guy.


33 posted on 06/02/2010 8:08:48 PM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa
"When was Hillary offered the SOS job?"

Interesting question. That nominating convention was a bit odd . . .

34 posted on 06/02/2010 8:09:27 PM PDT by Think free or die
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch
There is a cancer on the presidency.
This goes all the way to the top.
The only questions that now remain are what did the President know, and when did he know it?

Heh. And we already have a leading candidate for "Deep Throat":


35 posted on 06/02/2010 8:11:13 PM PDT by Yossarian (A pro-life democrat is one who holds out for something in return for his pro-abortion vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Yossarian

Here comes the race card.


36 posted on 06/02/2010 8:11:14 PM PDT by NotSoModerate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NotSoModerate
Here comes the race card.

I can hear them now...in Obama's culture it's not wrong to do this type of thing. Just because you're white (and not from Chicago) you can't understand.

37 posted on 06/02/2010 8:15:40 PM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
18 U.S.C. § 600 : US Code - Section 600: Promise of employment or other benefit for political activity
38 posted on 06/02/2010 8:19:04 PM PDT by Stentor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

“May be the worst political scandal since Watergate.”

Watergate was nothing compared to what this corrupt Obama administration has done.


39 posted on 06/02/2010 8:32:57 PM PDT by 1035rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 1035rep
Watergate was nothing compared to what this corrupt Obama administration has done.

Yes, in the GM and Chrysler take-overs alone, impeachable offenses were committed.

40 posted on 06/02/2010 8:35:53 PM PDT by Yossarian (A pro-life democrat is one who holds out for something in return for his pro-abortion vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson