[the_Watchman]

I found this article almost impossible to read. The author inserts his own lingo and unnecessarily deprecates the opposition while heaping praise on the papers which support his position. I much prefer a more even, unbiased exposition.

[jimfree]

I found this article almost impossible to read. The author inserts his own lingo and unnecessarily deprecates the opposition while heaping praise on the papers which support his position. I much prefer a more even, unbiased exposition.

It reads like a bar discussion interspersed with scientific cites - not well written at all and detracting from the argument.