Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: A_Former_Democrat
As a transportation engineer with some background in public transportation I find this analysis about as useful as Rand Paul’s comments on the Civil Rights Act.

And you expect us to believe you can be objective? Yeah.

43 posted on 05/31/2010 8:27:48 PM PDT by metalurgist (Want your country back? It'll take guns and rope. Marxists won't go without a fight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: metalurgist

I’m involved much more heavily in highways than public transit. Transportation engineering involves everything from airports to railroads to traffic signals to pipelines. I don’t have any vested interest in one mode over another.

My point on Rand Paul, who I actually support, is that he took an abstract libertarian concept and applied it to the landmark civil rights legislation of our time, a measure passed due to Republican support. When a think tank like the Cato Institute does this type of study regarding modes of transportation it opens conservatives up to the same criticism that Dr. Paul got. Theory is fine, but sometimes one has to look at the broader values of society. Dr. Paul was born in 1963 and could not be expected to have seen segregated accommodations and lunch tables. I saw them.

Just as we have to accept some societal responsibility for a basic public transportation system (both intra- and intercity) we have to accept the idea of open public accommodations regardless of race or ethnic origin.


48 posted on 05/31/2010 9:25:50 PM PDT by Dark Fired Tobacco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson