Let me get this straight. The first woman to be executed in this country was convicted because she hosted an assassin. And however much she may have been "innocent" of the eventual charges which got her hung, there was enough "evidence" at least to "convict" her of something negative, scandal-wise, in the press alone.
But, on the other hand, you tell us that just because a Catholic hospital "hosts" this abortionist...as long as he keeps his grisly practice on the "outer limit boundaries" of Mercy Hospital...hey, at least we're actin' like Sargent Joe Friday ("just the facts, ma'am").
If you have a problem with the Catholic Church, that is certainly your right. However, I wonder why you fail to acknowledge that the Catholic Church has been consistently on the side of life.
If you have a problem with a Catholic hospital allowing a doctor who performs abortions to have hospital privileges, I have already agreed with you. However, based on state laws it may not be as easy as we would like for hospitals to revoke privileges.
My real problem is your insinuation that I am somehow defending this hospital, because that is an utter FALSEHOOD. If you read my posting history, you will find that I consistently come down on the side of life regardless of a person's or institution's religious affiliations.