Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Newsweek Deadline Draws Near (Chris Ruddy may bid - Dinosaur Media DeathWatch™)
The Wall Street Journal ^ | May 29, 2010 | Russell Adams

Posted on 05/30/2010 6:02:57 AM PDT by abb

A private-equity firm and a publisher of a right-wing magazine are among prospective buyers expected to enter the first round of bidding for Newsweek magazine.

OpenGate Capital, the investment firm that owns TV Guide, plans to formally declare its interest in acquiring Newsweek before Wednesday's deadline for nonbinding bids, according to managing partner Andrew Nikou. Christopher Ruddy, publisher of the conservative monthly magazine Newsmax, said he also plans to bid.

Thomson Reuters Corp. is unlikely to submit a letter of interest by next week's deadline, but the financial news and information company could partner on a bid later in the process, according to a person familiar with the company's thinking. Media mogul Haim Saban initially expressed an interest, but it is unclear if he will enter the fray. A spokesperson for Mr. Saban declined to comment.

Meanwhile, Bloomberg LP, Fast Company publisher Mansueto Ventures and Mort Zuckerman, owner of U.S. News & World Report, all said they are not interested.

Newsweek owner Washington Post Co. recently said it would try to sell the unprofitable magazine and hired Allen & Co. to shop it. The investment bank has circulated a summary of Newsweek and details about the bidding process, which requires prospective buyers to submit a purchase price and financing plan by 5 p.m. EDT Wednesday.

Post Co. indicated in the summary sent to potential buyers that the company would assume all long-term employee-related liabilities, including pension and retirement obligations, as of the sale date. It also indicated in the summary it will assume "certain" severance obligations. A person familiar with the matter said Post Co. has offered to cover severance costs for up to 200 Newsweek employees not retained by the new owner. Newsweek has 379 full-time-equivalent employees.

snip

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: advertising; dbm; magazines; newsweek
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 last
To: abb
It takes 379 FTEE to produce that pathetic weakly reader.
61 posted on 05/30/2010 9:29:34 AM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

Yes, this news has been out for a year or more.

Some proof that the Obama admin is keeping anyone from buying a magazine, or anything would help.

Dem presidents are not the only ones have that feuded with the media.

Acting paranoid without any reason makes us look like kooks.


62 posted on 05/30/2010 9:32:20 AM PDT by BunnySlippers (I LOVE BULL MARKETS . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: pepsi_junkie
I submit that the Newsweek staff would certainly do the same thing, reacting with horror at the prospect of a news organization having to report anything... gasp! ... conservative. I would hope anyone who buys them says "buzz off, I'm not signing anything. In fact, go find another job. I bought it for the brand, not the staff of leftist jerks that ruined it in the first place."

My feelings exactly. IMO, the deal killer is this quote: Post Co. indicated in the summary sent to potential buyers that the company would assume all long-term employee-related liabilities, including pension and retirement obligations, as of the sale date.

No, fire everybody with the option to rehire those you want (probably no reporters) then fill the ranks with your own people. That's why you buy the outfit in the first place.

63 posted on 05/30/2010 9:33:02 AM PDT by Oatka ("A society of sheep must in time beget a government of wolves." –Bertrand de Jouvenel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: abb

They aren’t done yet. The key to the Left is being able to infiltrate and turn institutions which have a positive reputation. Hence, they can be fully left-wing while pretending to be unbiased.

It takes a special something to be that dishonest.


64 posted on 05/30/2010 10:19:44 AM PDT by AmishDude (It doesn't matter whom you vote for, it matters who takes office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Oatka

That explains why it hasn’t been sold. Nobody’s going to take on Newsweek as a vanity.

Besides, the Post can take on these obligations, just hire them for the newspaper.


65 posted on 05/30/2010 10:22:47 AM PDT by AmishDude (It doesn't matter whom you vote for, it matters who takes office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers

“Why would Chris Ruddy buy Dinosaur Media? Does he want to lose money?”

He probably sees the opportunity to make some money. Conservative media *can* make some money. Even if it’s printed on dead trees.

The basic economic problem with the left stream media is that the market is completely saturated. How many leftist rags do you need to support the minority of the population that holds that point of view?


66 posted on 05/30/2010 10:40:08 AM PDT by RKBA Democrat (Repudiate the 0bama debt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: JimWayne; BunnySlippers
If Chris Ruddy buys it, will it still be “dinosaur media”?
Who knows? If they stop being anti-American and become pro-freedom, maybe people will start buying Newsweek.
Journalism is negative, superficial, and unrepresentative - inherently.
That is its business model, and that is why journalism cannot be conservative.
Journalism sets itself up as a cardboard hero, fit to slay cardboard dragons in the form of unoffending businessmen who wouldn't hurt a fly. Socialists are called "liberals" in America because journalists wanted to apply positive labels to the politicians who cooperated most in the journalist's endeavor of making Middle America into a "villain." America was (actually) liberal then, so the positive label "liberal" was applied to the socialists like FDR who were anything but actual liberals.

67 posted on 05/30/2010 10:59:14 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion ( DRAFT PALIN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude

He could morph NewsMax into Newsweek (or vice versa) fairly easily I would think...


68 posted on 05/30/2010 11:01:02 AM PDT by GVnana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: abb
"assume all long-term employee-related liabilities, including pension and retirement"

You are right and this sentence shows why it is not worth buying.

69 posted on 05/30/2010 12:43:09 PM PDT by Jimmy Valentine (DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion

Agree with you. I have a similar view as you, but when I say that it becomes pro-freedom, I mean that it needs to morph into something resembling a conservative publication.


70 posted on 05/30/2010 1:18:00 PM PDT by JimWayne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: abb

It makes no sense for anyone to buy as a stand alone entity. Someone would have to pair it with other assets to make it worth keeping around. If WaPo couldn’t do it, it probably doesn’t have any synergistic value.


71 posted on 06/01/2010 9:17:48 PM PDT by MovementConservative (Go Mariners!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson