1. This is the NYT covering for their chosen messiah.
2. All progress involves risk. To avoid risk is to avoid progress and the betterment of mankind. Sadly, risk avoidance in the private sector is something the dems, and especially this administration, cannot stand.
Sadly, risk avoidance in the private sector is something the dems, and especially this administration, cannot stand. [correction: Ed.]
Good points ... and
#3. Any internal emails with sufficient content of back-and-forth can be selectively presented / edited to make any viewpoint prevalent.
This finding in no way absolves Obama.
Suppose BP were to have intentionally caused this calamity, absolutely on purpose. Just suppose.
Obama didn’t care. He was aloof, hands-off, on vacation both figuratively and literally. There was, unlike Bush during Katrina, no chaos on the ground to keep him from going to the coast. It took weeks and considerable political and public pressure for him to give more than casual lip service.
So I can’t agree with your conclusion #1, because whatever the NYT motives may be, at this point it’s impossible to cover for Barry 0.
As a leader he’s hopeless.