Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Let's hear some ideas to cap this oil leak ...
5-29-10 | boycott

Posted on 05/29/2010 2:27:01 PM PDT by boycott

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-244 next last
To: boycott

No time to read all 200+ posts, so I’ll just ask why they are not planning on connecting 5000 feet of 36” pipe then move it over and lower it over the escaping gusher and tap it out on the topside to control the release into tankers which can take it for refining?


221 posted on 05/29/2010 5:33:13 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Obots, believing they cannot be deceived, it is impossible to convince them when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boycott

Collapse the pipe and sink large tethered steel mesh bags of heavy objects.


222 posted on 05/29/2010 5:35:17 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Your Hope has been redistributed. Here's your Change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boycott

Just a thought how to stop the flow of oil coming out of the ground.

Employ a device resembling a canon, in form of a long very heavy metal tube closed on one end with the purpose of launching a projectile. It does not have to have any rifling with the caliber or diameter of the projectile about the same as the bore hole or slightly larger. The projectile could be slightly tapered in front, and be a NONE explosive metal cylinder with a heavy powder charge behind it. Then make an attempt to position it over the original bore hole which may or may not have to be trimmed some what cleaned up to facilitate and allow the entry of this solid metal cylinder or projectile in to the original bore hole.

Then put a heavy powder charge behind this NONE explosive projectile and shoot it in to the bore hole to close it off. Since the projectile would be recessed in this metal barrel or firing tube, arrangements could be made using compressed air to blow out any water first before firing the projectile in to the bore hole, similar to using a torpedo, except in this case it would be none explosive and only used to plug the hole.

The whole contraption in form of a long heavy metal tube could be suspended from cables above and guided over the bore hole and used repeatedly if the initial try would be unsuccessful. Also these metal plugs or projectiles could be cast from solid lead what could be easily bored out and restore the flow of oil in a safe manner once its purpose has been accomplished. Even if the first shot would not be successful repeated attempts may cave in the remaining pipe and pound what is left in to the ground similar in effect to a pile driver.

Well this is just a thought or suggestion; shoot something in to the bore hole when everything else failed to do the trick. I am quite certain if a heavy metal dome was fabricated previously to catch the escaping flow of oil in a fairly short amount of time, the contraption as suggested by me could be rigged up just as quickly.


223 posted on 05/29/2010 5:38:00 PM PDT by saintgermaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chris37

Just a thought how to stop the flow of oil coming out of the ground.

Employ a device resembling a canon, in form of a long very heavy metal tube closed on one end with the purpose of launching a projectile. It does not have to have any rifling with the caliber or diameter of the projectile about the same as the bore hole or slightly larger. The projectile could be slightly tapered in front, and be a NONE explosive metal cylinder with a heavy powder charge behind it. Then make an attempt to position it over the original bore hole which may or may not have to be trimmed some what cleaned up to facilitate and allow the entry of this solid metal cylinder or projectile in to the original bore hole.

Then put a heavy powder charge behind this NONE explosive projectile and shoot it in to the bore hole to close it off. Since the projectile would be recessed in this metal barrel or firing tube, arrangements could be made using compressed air to blow out any water first before firing the projectile in to the bore hole, similar to using a torpedo, except in this case it would be none explosive and only used to plug the hole.

The whole contraption in form of a long heavy metal tube could be suspended from cables above and guided over the bore hole and used repeatedly if the initial try would be unsuccessful. Also these metal plugs or projectiles could be cast from solid lead what could be easily bored out and restore the flow of oil in a safe manner once its purpose has been accomplished. Even if the first shot would not be successful repeated attempts may cave in the remaining pipe and pound what is left in to the ground similar in effect to a pile driver.

Well this is just a thought or suggestion; shoot something in to the bore hole when everything else failed to do the trick. I am quite certain if a heavy metal dome was fabricated previously to catch the escaping flow of oil in a fairly short amount of time, the contraption as suggested by me could be rigged up just as quickly.


224 posted on 05/29/2010 5:38:26 PM PDT by saintgermaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

I posted elsewhere that it would be great if the surface oil could be scavenged by anyone and sold back to BP at special marked up cost.


225 posted on 05/29/2010 5:39:14 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Your Hope has been redistributed. Here's your Change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies]

To: boycott

Just a thought how to stop the flow of oil coming out of the ground.

Employ a device resembling a canon, in form of a long very heavy metal tube closed on one end with the purpose of launching a projectile. It does not have to have any rifling with the caliber or diameter of the projectile about the same as the bore hole or slightly larger. The projectile could be slightly tapered in front, and be a NONE explosive metal cylinder with a heavy powder charge behind it. Then make an attempt to position it over the original bore hole which may or may not have to be trimmed some what cleaned up to facilitate and allow the entry of this solid metal cylinder or projectile in to the original bore hole.

Then put a heavy powder charge behind this NONE explosive projectile and shoot it in to the bore hole to close it off. Since the projectile would be recessed in this metal barrel or firing tube, arrangements could be made using compressed air to blow out any water first before firing the projectile in to the bore hole, similar to using a torpedo, except in this case it would be none explosive and only used to plug the hole.

The whole contraption in form of a long heavy metal tube could be suspended from cables above and guided over the bore hole and used repeatedly if the initial try would be unsuccessful. Also these metal plugs or projectiles could be cast from solid lead what could be easily bored out and restore the flow of oil in a safe manner once its purpose has been accomplished. Even if the first shot would not be successful repeated attempts may cave in the remaining pipe and pound what is left in to the ground similar in effect to a pile driver.

Well this is just a thought or suggestion; shoot something in to the bore hole when everything else failed to do the trick. I am quite certain if a heavy metal dome was fabricated previously to catch the escaping flow of oil in a fairly short amount of time, the contraption as suggested by me could be rigged up just as quickly.


226 posted on 05/29/2010 5:43:18 PM PDT by saintgermaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: boycott

I say pump all the nuclear waste that was headed for yaka mountain into it :)


227 posted on 05/29/2010 5:44:13 PM PDT by TexasFreeper2009 (Obama = Epic Fail)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigoil
Nuke it, Baby, Nuke it.

You really trust the kenyan with a nuke? Be careful what you wish for!
228 posted on 05/29/2010 5:51:03 PM PDT by vigilante2 (Reelect Nobody)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: boycott
Funny thing, I was just suggesting this very thing to my husband this evening. Must be in the airwaves, lol.

I do think this sort would work, just not sure about all the pressure from the oil coming out.

I feel BP is doing everything they know how to do, and are receptive to good ideas.

The thing going forward for any new rigs, is have more cut off valves in place, of course I am not an engineer and mostly don't know what I am suggesting. lol

229 posted on 05/29/2010 6:02:39 PM PDT by annieokie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mountain Mary

Oh, as for cleaning the oil out of the water, I think the farmers had the best idea. Spread straw on top of the water in the Gulf, leave it for a day or so, then rake it up. The straw absorbs the oil.


230 posted on 05/29/2010 6:06:47 PM PDT by WVNan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: cd jones

I like that. That’s an excellent idea.


231 posted on 05/29/2010 6:16:29 PM PDT by boycott (CAL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: WVNan

Oh, as for cleaning the oil out of the water, I think the farmers had the best idea. Spread straw on top of the water in the Gulf, leave it for a day or so, then rake it up. The straw absorbs the oil.


Agree. I believe you could even burn the straw over the water. It sure beats it going into our marsh land.


232 posted on 05/29/2010 6:24:25 PM PDT by boycott (CAL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: annieokie

Agree. I believe the important thing now is to focus on capturing the oil. There’s too much pressure at this point to try to stop the flow.


233 posted on 05/29/2010 6:40:19 PM PDT by boycott (CAL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

No time to read all 200+ posts, so I’ll just ask why they are not planning on connecting 5000 feet of 36” pipe then move it over and lower it over the escaping gusher and tap it out on the topside to control the release into tankers which can take it for refining?


Agree. It’s time to focus on capturing the oil. It can be capped when they have the relief well in place.


234 posted on 05/29/2010 6:42:41 PM PDT by boycott (CAL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies]

To: boycott
The pipe idea to a tanker would work, it is just how to get it over and around the oil pressure.

I have a feeling that BP has thought of all this themselves, they are the experts, I am just an imaginative idiot, yet smarter than ZERO. rofl

235 posted on 05/29/2010 6:59:19 PM PDT by annieokie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies]

To: annieokie

The pipe idea to a tanker would work, it is just how to get it over and around the oil pressure.


What if they put a large concrete/steel top-cover over it with one side having a large valve that can be closed off (slowly if necessary) and the other side has a large pipe going up to the tankers on the surface?

I know BP has a lot of people working on it but they’re also the same folks that pumped golfballs and mud into the hole.

Hopefully, they’ve got some good plans.

BTW, I have forwarded this thread along with any reasonable plans I’ve read on to Deep Water Horizon. They may not read these suggestions but I cannot just sit idle and do nothing. If they GAIN JUST ONE THING from the suggestions, it’s all worthwhile to me.

Anyway, I know we’re all just hoping this nightmare goes away soon.


236 posted on 05/29/2010 7:41:06 PM PDT by boycott (CAL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies]

To: boycott
That sounds reasonable and doable.

God bless you for your thoughts and attempts on this. I will not understand them not reading suggestions.

We may not be as educated as they are, but from necessity comes the MOTHER of invention. People have good ideas, and you never know what will click.

Send them everything you think of. Give them this thread, and keep this thread going. Something has to be done.

237 posted on 05/29/2010 7:49:06 PM PDT by annieokie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies]

To: annieokie

God Bless you too for your thoughts.

I have forwarded this thread to them. That along with every other thought that I’ve had. They’re trying to take the suggestions in. They’ve had over 7,000 since the spill began.

I’ll give them a lot of credit for being very responsive. They’ve been responsive to both emails and an earlier telephone conversations I had with them.

As I’ve posted, if they can pick up just one idea, it might mean the difference between this thing ending or it going into August.


238 posted on 05/29/2010 8:07:15 PM PDT by boycott (CAL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies]

To: boycott
I would be very interested in what they are saying to you and what if any ideas they are taking.

Keep me posted will you please?

Great job you are doing.

239 posted on 05/29/2010 8:12:47 PM PDT by annieokie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies]


240 posted on 05/29/2010 9:29:08 PM PDT by razbinn (I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America,and to the republic for which it ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-244 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson