[dhs12345]

Yup. But the local Liberal rag, the Denver Post, is ignoring it and hoping it will go away.

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/p-j-gladnick/2010/05/27/denver-post-goes-silent-senate-candidate-job-offer-scandal#ixzz0pFCwM5Zw

We stopped subscribing to the Post many years ago. I don’t understand why they are still in business.

[stephenjohnbanker]

” I don’t understand why they are still in business. “

It takes awhile for a long established newspaper to go under.

[screaminsunshine]

Wait til Cheney and Palin weigh in. The Leftist Media will go apoplectic.

[Matchett-PI]

"We stopped subscribing to the Post many years ago. I don’t understand why they are still in business."

Probably for the same reason Jesse Jackass and Sharpton are still in business. As long as they faithfully spew the 'RAT narrative and keep delivering the votes to the 'RAT Party they'll be supported in a round-about way out of one of the slush-funds the 'RATs have set up (like TARP, Fannie and Freddie, etc.), by 'RAT legislators, or by one of the 'RAT-agenda supporters like Soros, Maurice Strong, Peter Lewis, et.al., ad nauseum.

[wildandcrazyrussian]

In answer to your question about the Denver Post still being in business (as we wonder about so many left-wing papers):

The main source of revenue for a newspaper is advertisers, NOT subscribers. The only reason to have "subscribers" is to use that number to set the advertising rates for the advertisers. Theoretically, they could give the paper away (like many weekly shoppers do), but the fact that subscribers pay is considered a more definitive indication of true market penetration when selling ads to large advertisers, such as all grocery stores and auto dealers.