Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Chunga85

I guess that depends on whether the lender or owner of the note is able to establish the note was valid and signed before it was lost and the court agrees to reinstate it as requested in their lawsuit. If it does, it is no longer enforcing an unsigned negotiable note.


6 posted on 05/29/2010 8:11:55 AM PDT by caseinpoint (Don't get thickly involved in thin things)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: caseinpoint

Another interesting element in play here is what takes place, or more appropriately, does not take place at the County Clerk of Court.

The securitization process of residential mortgages has paved the way for “lenders” to avoid paying recording fees, doc stamps, etc.

This amounts to many millions of dollars that go uncollected and remain due and payable.

With budgets so tight these days how can this be allowed to happen?

Particularly in favor of “lenders” who have already been bailed out.

The land record data is public. If any Clerk of Court out there reads this and allows me the time, I volunteer to show you how this is happening.

More importantly, I will volunteer to show you how to recover this money and return it to the taxpayers....where it rightly belongs.

http://www.foreclosurehamlet.org


7 posted on 05/29/2010 8:14:31 AM PDT by Chunga85 ("Foreclosure Fraud", TARP, "Mortgage Crisis", Bailout)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson