Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pharmboy
During the election, Edwards asked the Obama team if they would let him have Attorney General or even the Vice Presidency if he endorsed Obama. That would be horse trading.

In the Sestak case, there appears to be an attempt to interfere in an election by means of trying to get a Senatorial candidate to drop out so that the favored candidate would get elected. The inducement would be a Presidential appointment. And remember, that the appointment cannot be offered by Emanuel unless the President agrees to it. Emanuel can't make the appointment, only Obama can. And THAT is a bribe.

And wasn't there also something happening in New York regarding the Gillibrand election? I seem to recall that someone in the Obama administration talked someone out of challenging her. It just seems that there is a pattern of behavior of Obama being involved in these things.

18 posted on 05/27/2010 6:10:59 PM PDT by Enterprise (Dan Rather said Obama is so incompetent he couldn't sell watermelons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: Enterprise

Thanks for your explanation...I see the difference now.


22 posted on 05/27/2010 6:15:02 PM PDT by Pharmboy (The Stone Age did not end because they ran out of stones...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson