Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: balch3

If I were a juror on this case I would be on the side of the organ recipient. Ignorance is no excuse and therefore the doctors are responsible. Testing of organs for disease should be mandatory before transplantation if it isn’t already because it is just plain old common sense.


13 posted on 05/27/2010 2:52:06 PM PDT by Ev Reeman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Ev Reeman
Testing of organs for disease should be mandatory before transplantation if it isn’t already because it is just plain old common sense.

How? How do you pick up a tiny focus of cancer cells in the organ? How long would it take? How many organs would die and be useless? This is a very rare occurrence. EVERYTHING in medicine is risk versus benefit. The correct analysis is the rare risk of a complication like this worth the benefit of receiving a transplant.
25 posted on 05/27/2010 3:19:25 PM PDT by Kozak (USA 7/4/1776 to 1/20/2009 Reqiescat in Pace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson