Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TaraP
You were saying ...

It truly goes into the Nature of GOD millions of years before the creation of human beings....

Let me give you a little bit of my "thinking" on this and see what you think. I'm just "keying in" on this one sentence to illustrate.

First, I'll start off by saying that we know that God has given us His written word (i.e., the Bible) and that it is the inerrant, infallible and inspired Word of God. We have that now.

We know that it is "God-breathed" and the very words of God, Himself, even though God used "human agency" to pen it, through those He chose to do so.

NOW..., having that as a "backdrop" ... we move to this particular writing, in which we are told of the "nature of GOD millions of years before the creation of human beings".

If we are told of something that happened millions of years before the creation of human beings, and since we know from the inerrant and infallible Word of God that the first human being was created on Day 6 of "Creation", and with the entirety of existence, of "creation" having been done only five days before that -- then -- the only "witness" to what happened millions of years before that -- was God Himself, and no one else. That's because we already know that "creation" itself did not exist back then millions of years prior those six creation days, but only God existed. Again..., since we are told about the beginning of creation, by God Himself, we know about that.

And this means that this account "has to be" the "very witness of God Himself" (and you know it has to be if it's talking about things that happened with God being the only One around) -- and thus -- this "account of things back then", either has to be "the Inspired Word of God" -- or -- it's an outright lie and hoax (i.e., it wasn't something that God tells us about, it's something someone "made up").

Since we already have the complete and full Word of God, and since this particular account (that you refer to) can be none other than either (1) the Word of God or (2) a hoax (nothing else inbetween, since there was no other witness to that time frame, other than God, Himself) -- my immediate conclusion is that this is (and "has to be") a total hoax and fraud.

51 posted on 05/27/2010 7:56:14 PM PDT by Star Traveler (Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: Star Traveler

Well ST...On this I respectfully dis-agree with you...

I think the Mysteries of GOD have been revealed and although with all my being, I agree the Holy Scriptures are the infalliable Word of GOD, I think the Infinite Alpha and Omega GOD is more than everything that can be revealed in the Holy Bible, that or maybe was left out due to the cosmology of GOD that most would not understand and would think the Bible was something odd or occultish....

I think this scripture does tell us GOD wants us to know and learn all what has been hidden..

‘Call to Me and I will answer you, and I will tell you great and mighty things, which you do not know.’ Jeremiah 33:3

I think if you read that Manuscript the Origin of Chaos you will have some great insight, you might not agree with it, but like I said before it is a fascinating read....


53 posted on 05/27/2010 8:12:30 PM PDT by TaraP (He never offered our victories without fighting but he said help would always come in time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: Star Traveler; All
The Bible is not the inerrant, infallible and inspired Word of God. It is the inerrant, infallible and inspired word of the winners of the Council of Nicea in the Fourth Century. Once they had the power, they worked vigorously to reject and erase any other "biblical"; writings they didn't agree with and labeling them heretical. In addition they pulled together several different versions of old and new testament writings, without even editing out various contradictions. One example is the two different versions of the creation of man and woman in Genesis. In one version God created man and woman out of the earth. In the other version he created woman out of one of Adam's ribs. How inerrant is that. This leads to considerable potential ideological conflict. Are man and woman coequal in the eyes of God, or is woman subordinate to man? I haven't checked this myself, but I am told that the Resurrection descriptions in Matthew, Mark, Luke and John are not in agreement in important details. Since God used "human agency" to pen it, and humans are notoriously fallible, what they have written may be "God inspired", but it is hardly "inerrent and infallible."
84 posted on 05/28/2010 10:29:34 PM PDT by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson