Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Will88

Let’s go back to your post # 67. It shows a lack of understanding of what is going on. Your statements have said exactly nothing since your constant reference to the Admiral’s statement of this morning.

This whole operation may go to hell at some later time, but I believe that what you are seeing “gushing out” of that whole is the mud which is being pumped down the well to counter the blowout.


130 posted on 05/27/2010 1:40:41 PM PDT by wordsofearnest (Brad Ellsworth is giving Indiana a twofer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies ]


To: wordsofearnest

New York Times:

Setback Delays ‘Top Kill’ Effort to Seal Leaking Oil Well in Gulf
By CLIFFORD KRAUSS, JOHN M. BRODER and LIZ ROBBINS 15 minutes ago

BP had to temporarily stop its effort to plug the well when engineers saw that too much of the fluid they were injecting into the well was escaping along with the leaking crude oil.


138 posted on 05/27/2010 1:49:22 PM PDT by mojitojoe (banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies ]

To: wordsofearnest
This whole operation may go to hell at some later time, but I believe that what you are seeing “gushing out” of that whole is the mud which is being pumped down the well to counter the blowout.

Yeah, let's look at what I actually said since you never bother to actually show us what you are talking about.

And, as several have said here, the supposedly live underwater video shows something still gushing into the water.

An average reader would have known that my statement made no claim of knowing exactly what was happening. I made NO claim about what was gushing out, and clearly made my uncertainly known. I wondered whether it was crude or mud, which is why I wrote the sentence I wrote.

But you based your silly replies to me on the false notion that I claimed oil was still gushing from the leaks. I made no such statement, and most average readers would have known that.

No more time will be wasted responded to this silliness of yours.

My only, and 100% true original statements were that the information in the thread was old, and no new information had come along to justify the claims of success in the headline for the thread, and in the discussion.

144 posted on 05/27/2010 1:59:44 PM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson