This about puts a knife in the whole justification for earmarks and pork barrel spending. It only benefits those connected to the government and political fat cats. The rest of the businesses suffer. Better not to have the Committee chairperson who brings home the pork!. Wild ride for the folks who justify everything based on the Keynesian model that has been proven wrong in most every setting now.
1 posted on
05/27/2010 8:21:26 AM PDT by
dalight
To: dalight
To: dalight
You’re correct in your thought process since your thought process is based on facts and common sense.
From a Congressional thought press this can’t happen because government is here to help and the outcome of the report is completely wrong and to prove it they’ll increase earmarks and pork barrel spending.
4 posted on
05/27/2010 8:27:26 AM PDT by
maddog55
(OBAMA, Why stupid people shouldn't vote.)
To: dalight
This also sticks a fork in the agrument against term limits. Those against term limits have always said that we need “senior” members (lifers) in congress to hold leadership positions, so we could have all the pork and power. Guess that doesn’t help, after all.
7 posted on
05/27/2010 8:42:31 AM PDT by
Hoffer Rand
(There ARE two Americas: "God's children" and the tax payers)
To: dalight
9 posted on
05/27/2010 8:58:03 AM PDT by
AT7Saluki
(No cejar, no ceder)
To: dalight
This is impossible, we all know that West Virginia is a shining beacon on a hill. Thank you Senator Byrd!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson