Jesus wasn't an atheist, nor did you have an adulterous affair with a woman, nor did he advocate the murder of the innocent unborn. Here are the nutcases you're defending:
"If we consider what it is rather than what it might become, we must acknowledge that the embryo under three months is something far more primitive than a frog or a fish. To compare it to an infant is ludicrous."
http://www.aynrand.org/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&id=5351
I wasn’t defending anything.
Specifically, I was asking how a person not having children rendered their philosophy invalid, which is the concept that your post stated.