So the LP in Kentucky does not believe in the ‘right to association’? They believe in the Federal government dictating to private businesses who they must associate with?
In response to my own question:
I just looked at their website and they are not really libertarians at all. They are progressives. They not only believe that the Federal government should dictate to private business who they could associate with in regards to race but also that all business should be forced to accept people’s non-traditional behavior (perversions). This group is not at all for individual liberty but is instead for the fascist agenda of having government force a perverted morality upon its citizens. Pathetic.
That’s what I was wondering. It would seem that Paul’s criticism of the Civil Rights act fits right in with the libertarian philosophy.