Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Publius
How would Hamilton have reacted to Wickard?

He would probably have welcomed it.

5 posted on 05/27/2010 8:19:28 AM PDT by Bigun ("It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Bigun; Publius
Wickard

Hell, Scalia recently used Wickard in his opinion upholding the war on marijuana, to the delight of the majority of "conservatives." The modern "conservative" movement is for the most part Hamiltonian, which is to say, big government nationalist. They only seem to be for limited government because the opposition is the socialist party.

8 posted on 05/27/2010 8:37:48 AM PDT by Huck (Q: How can you tell a party is in the majority? A: They're complaining about the fillibuster.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Bigun
I'm not sure Hamilton would have welcomed Wickard. What Hamilton wanted was a vigorous Executive running a vigorous federal government that aided the commercial and speculative classes in their all-important goal of making money. If a vigorous federal government could help them make money, fine. However, he would not have wanted a vigorous federal government getting in the way of making money, and he would never have wanted a vigorous federal government nationalizing and running entire industries, especially the banking industry, which was near and dear to his heart.
17 posted on 05/27/2010 9:17:59 AM PDT by Publius (Unless the Constitution is followed, it is simply a piece of paper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson