Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: UCANSEE2
Trying for the shut off, trying to box it, trying to sip straw it...

All solutions that leave the wellhead intact and easily put back into service instead of just STOPPING it first and worrying about re-tapping later.

I'm fine with them trying to protect their investment, but I'm not fine with them doing so while their actions/in-actions are actively harming others.

Their total costs in cleanup and reparations to those property/business owners along the coast will exceed the cost of having to re-tap the well.

Public relations aside, how is that "smart" business?

242 posted on 05/27/2010 8:19:54 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (III, Alarm and Muster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies ]


To: Dead Corpse

They have said from the beginning that they intend on plugging the initial well. No one in their right mind would produce through a well that has a compromised cement job across their liner. The replacements wells are intended to be actual producers.


246 posted on 05/27/2010 8:24:43 AM PDT by crusty old prospector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson