Her campaign ammo has been to project herself as a non-politician and complain about her opponents being "career politicians" to deflect the fact that she has very little in political advocacy (even in voting), so why would any sane person take what she says at face value? And the fact that she backed and worked for "career politician" McCain (who has more years in office than Campbell and DeVore combined!) just makes her a two-faced phony... I guess some career policians are more acceptable when you're not running against one, eh?
So with little in her political resume, what she has advocated for in public life is very important, and starts to paint the picture of the REAL Carly Fiorina, not just some image designed by her and her political consultants.
INTEGRITY... a trait still important to some Republicans.
No, it simply speaks to her being involved on an issue even if she may have been on the wrong side of it. Co-publishing an op-ed is not a violation of the law.
Her campaign ammo has been to project herself as a non-politician and complain about her opponents being "career politicians" to deflect the fact that she has very little in political advocacy (even in voting), so why would any sane person take what she says at face value?
So we can disregard this article then, right?
After all, her words meant nothing. She was just a private individual speaking out on an issue.
And the fact that she backed and worked for "career politician" McCain (who has more years in office than Campbell and DeVore combined!) just makes her a two-faced phony... I guess some career policians are more acceptable when you're not running against one, eh?
That doesn't mean anything.
So with little in her political resume, what she has advocated for in public life is very important, and starts to paint the picture of the REAL Carly Fiorina, not just some image designed by her and her political consultants.
I see it differently. I see someone who is the head of a major trans-national corporation and thought this idea would be the best way to improve the schools in CA. Whether or not she was right or wrong isn't the point. It is not unusual for a corporate executive to get involved with issues pertaining to their community or state. And this issue is irrelevant to her campaign. She's not going to be dealing with CA property taxes in the Senate.