Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: W. W. SMITH
and when you follow the logic of this ,Dick Cheney is the president even though not sworn in.

I can't think of any logical path to this situation that results in Cheney being president.

44 posted on 05/25/2010 9:45:07 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur

For the record this lawsuit, “Hollister v Soetoro” was dismissed by the US District Court for the District of Columbia and the judge imposed a reprimand sanction on the plaintiff’s attorney for filing a “frivolous” lawsuit. The dismissal was upheld by the US Court of Appeals.

United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
____________
No. 09-5080 September Term 2009
08-cv-02254
Filed On: March 22, 2010
Gregory S. Hollister,
Appellant
v.
Barry Soetoro, in his capacity as a natural
person; de facto President in posse; and as de
jure President in posse, also known as Barack
Obama, et al.,
Appellees


Consolidated with 09-5161
ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
BEFORE:Henderson, Tatel, and Garland, Circuit Judges

J U D G M E N T
These consolidated appeals were considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties.
See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). It is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s orders filed March 5, 2009, and March 24, 2009, be affirmed. The district court correctly dismissed the complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Hollister v. Soetoro, 601 F. Supp. 2d 179 (D.D.C. 2009).
Moreover, the district court did not abuse its discretion in determining that counsel had violated Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11(b)(2) and in imposing a reprimand as the
sanction for his part in preparing, filing, and prosecuting a legally frivolous complaint.
Hollister v. Soetoro, 258 F.R.D. 1 (D.D.C. 2009). Appellants have provided no reasonable basis for questioning the impartiality of the district court judge. See Liteky v. United States, 510 U.S. 540 (1994).
http://www.scribd.com/doc/28745277/HOLLISTER-v-SOETORO-PER-CURIAM-JUDGMENT-filed-Lower-Court-Affirmed-Transport-Room


46 posted on 05/25/2010 10:22:41 AM PDT by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: Non-Sequitur
If obama is found to be ineligible that invalidates the ticket. The president and vice president is one ticket not two thus biden is disqualified. Both pelousie and reed are complicit in the fraud, therefore disqualified.

All of this takes us back to January 20, 2009 on that podium at the capital. there are five men on that podium, four of whom are not qualified. that leaves Dick Cheney as the only one qualified and Even though not sworn in he is the president.

with obama not qualified he is not the president and legally this nation cannot be with out a president, again this makes Cheney the president.

48 posted on 05/25/2010 10:31:41 AM PDT by W. W. SMITH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson