That should be repeated over and over and over again. Why would anyone brush that off? An organization that claims to be fighting against breast cancer is actually invested in spreading it.
It reminds me of when people donated money to the Red Cross to help victims of the terrorist attacks on 9/11, and the Red Cross sent those funds to Afghanistan. I don't give to the Red Cross (American or International). Does that mean I want American victims of disasters to die from neglect? No. It means I understand what that money is actually funding, and I refuse to fund the enemy.
I refuse to fund Planned Parenthood, so I don't (knowingly) fund their contributors, like the Komen Foundation. I like that the products connected to them are clearly marked bright pink, so I can easily avoid them.
Komen says in their published statements that they don't.
Either you are mistaken or they are wrong.
If you have evidence that you are right and they are wrong then that would be big news.
But I'm betting that you have nothing more than your opinion, no evidence at all.
Komen says they don't fund abortions and they monitor their grants and until someone shows something factual to disprove it then I will take them at their word.
I'll be happy to change my opinion if someone can bring out some financial forms from either group that show that Komen is actually funding abortions.
Should I hold my breath waiting for you to bring proof?