Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wagglebee

It wasn’t my intention to even discuss the links between breast cancer and abortion since I assumed it was factual.

The link today was something I stumbled on while looking for something else and surprised me.

I’m just constantly surprised at the amount of information you post that is either totally or mostly incorrect.

Those bullet points that you want me to verify are off of Komen’s literature. You are the one saying that that Komen is lying so it is upon you to provide documentation to support your claim. I have no obligation to step in on Komen’s behalf to support their claims.

The truth is that your battle isn’t with me it is with Komen. The problem you have is that Komen denies your claims.

You are challenging their claims but you are only doing it based on theory, not any evidence that proves anything.

Based on their figures, on average they grant about $3300 per clinic of breast health screening and education. That looks like about what one would expect to pay for a part time nurse and clinic space and equipment.

So you don’t agree with what they do? You still haven’t proven your claims.


166 posted on 06/02/2010 7:50:17 AM PDT by Eagle Eye (A blind clock finds a nut at least twice a day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies ]


To: Eagle Eye; metmom; BykrBayb; redgolum; Desdemona; Hoosier Catholic Momma; xzins; P-Marlowe; ...
It wasn’t my intention to even discuss the links between breast cancer and abortion since I assumed it was factual.

It is factual.

The link today was something I stumbled on while looking for something else and surprised me.

Yes, it's seven years old and one of the main researchers has since disputed it.

Those bullet points that you want me to verify are off of Komen’s literature. You are the one saying that that Komen is lying so it is upon you to provide documentation to support your claim. I have no obligation to step in on Komen’s behalf to support their claims.

You've been supporting Komen throughout this thread.

You have NEVER addressed the reality that the typical woman going to Planned Parenthood is at least a decade away from needing a mammogram.

The truth is that your battle isn’t with me it is with Komen. The problem you have is that Komen denies your claims.

Yes, that's why I posted this thread in the first place. NOBODY pinged you to come to their defense.

You are challenging their claims but you are only doing it based on theory, not any evidence that proves anything.

Actually, that's not true. YOU seem to want to ignore the facts that have been posted. Here is the evidence that I already posted:

 

National Cancer Institute Researcher Admits Abortion Breast Cancer Link

Research: Women in China See 17% Higher Breast Cancer Risk From Abortion

Abortion, birth control pill linked to breast cancer, surgeon says

Group Wants Probe of National Cancer Institute Abortion-Breast Cancer Coverup

Based on their figures, on average they grant about $3300 per clinic of breast health screening and education. That looks like about what one would expect to pay for a part time nurse and clinic space and equipment.

So, this is just a guess on your part?

So you don’t agree with what they do? You still haven’t proven your claims.

I'm not sure what you're talking about.

The link between abortion and breast cancer is established.

The link between PP and abortion is established

The link between Komen and PP is established.

167 posted on 06/02/2010 8:14:21 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson