Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Chamber joins suit against new union rule
The Hill ^ | May 24, 2010 | Kevin Bogardus

Posted on 05/24/2010 3:14:34 PM PDT by jazusamo

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce joined a federal lawsuit Monday against a new union organizing rule.

The Chamber filed a motion to intervene as a party-plaintiff in the Air Transport Association’s (ATA) suit against the National Mediation Board (NMB). The business lobbying group opposes a rule change finalized by the board earlier this month that makes it easier for workers at companies covered by the Railway Labor Act to unionize.

Under the rule, workers who don’t vote in a union election are not counted as votes either for or against forming a union. Such non-votes previously were counted as votes against forming a union, and labor organizers needed to win a majority of a company’s employees’ votes to form a union.

The new rule is expected to trigger more unionization at railway and airline companies that are covered by the law.

Since the rule change was finalized, it has come under increasing attack from Republicans and business associations.

“Not only has the Board been so bold as to throw out 75 years of precedent to tip the scales in favor of organized labor,” Randel Johnson, the Chamber’s senior vice president of labor, immigration, and employee benefits, said in a statement. “It has done so in a manner that was inherently defective and makes a mockery out of the administrative process.”

Sen. Johnny Isakson (R-Ga.) is gathering support among senators for using the Congressional Review Act to overturn the new rule. The act, rarely used, allows lawmakers to oversee and overturn regulations issued by any executive branch agency. Overturning a rule requires a resolution of disapproval approved by both the Congress and the president soon after the rule is issued. The resolution cannot be filibustered in the Senate.

Unions have defended the new rule and originally petitioned the board for its change.

“For far too long, the NMB rules have provided an upper hand to corporations encouraging voter suppression, while undermining those participating in the union representation election process,” AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka said in a statement when the rule was finalized earlier this month. “The new rule issued by the NMB allows for a more fair and consistent democratic process in which a majority of workers participating can have a free and clear choice to join together in a union and gain a voice at work.”


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ata; nmb; thugs; trumka; unions; uschambercommerce

1 posted on 05/24/2010 3:14:34 PM PDT by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Coming to the local Mom & Pop office supply store in your town........


2 posted on 05/24/2010 3:18:06 PM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

We just had an election, but just 6 of us voted out of 100. under the new law, the election is still valid?


3 posted on 05/24/2010 3:21:44 PM PDT by GeronL (Political Correctness Kills)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles

Obama and the Dems are trying hard to repay union thugs for helping elect him.


4 posted on 05/24/2010 3:21:59 PM PDT by jazusamo (But there really is no free lunch, except in the world of political rhetoric,.: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

That’s my understanding. All kinds of union thuggery is possible with this rule.


5 posted on 05/24/2010 3:23:22 PM PDT by jazusamo (But there really is no free lunch, except in the world of political rhetoric,.: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Unions are the storm troopers of socialism.


6 posted on 05/24/2010 3:25:54 PM PDT by Ben Mugged (Unions are the storm troopers of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
I get the national right to work newsletter and I found a disturbing item in the recent issue. In illinois, the SEIU will be going to the homes of home care workers who voted against unionization in hopes of "encoraging" them to reconsider.

The additional 4,500 home-care providers who are not yet under union control soundly rejected unionmembership by a two-to-one margin in a mail-in vote. However, per Quinn’s executive order, the home-care providers may again be subject to out-of-state SEIU and American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) union organizers making “home visits” attempting to organize the home-care providers through coercive “card check” unionization tactics.

NRTW newsletter (pdf file)
7 posted on 05/24/2010 3:29:12 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ben Mugged

See post number 7.


8 posted on 05/24/2010 3:29:40 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

This is outrageous, it amounts to legalized thuggery.

Thanks for posting.


9 posted on 05/24/2010 3:32:29 PM PDT by jazusamo (But there really is no free lunch, except in the world of political rhetoric,.: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Better get your head right before November. Don’t want to force the Obamatroopers to behave stupidly with your kneecaps.


10 posted on 05/24/2010 3:39:08 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
I don't see the problem with this rule. Why should the no-shows be automatically counted as "no" votes? If they don't bother to vote, it should not be counted either way. That's only fair, IMO.

However, the vote should definitely be by secret ballot.

11 posted on 05/24/2010 3:48:16 PM PDT by rmh47 (Go Kats! - Got Seven? [NRA Life Member])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rmh47

I see your point but who said anything about unions being fair. Some unions use any trick in the book including physical threats to sway workers to unionize.

Nonvoters have been counted as noes for the last 75 years for companies covered by the Railway Labor Act. I believe it should stay that way and if a majority of workers want to unionize they and the unions should get a majority of all those workers.


12 posted on 05/24/2010 4:07:32 PM PDT by jazusamo (But there really is no free lunch, except in the world of political rhetoric,.: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson