Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BushCountry

I was responding to the poster who sounded like it was Hillary’s files being requested. I was just trying to clarify whether they realized it was Kagan’s. Maybe they did, but that wasn’t clear to me from the post.

I know the Senators don’t care about dredging up Hillary’s old troubles...they are on KAGAN’S trail. Anything else would be a sideshow...

Will also bet that anything relating to Hillary or Bill’s personal legal troubles would be excluded or redacted...


103 posted on 05/24/2010 4:31:56 PM PDT by txrangerette ("Question with boldness. Hold to the truth. Speak without fear". - Glenn Beck -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]


To: txrangerette

You most likely are right. However, she would have to have submitted a legal opinion on a lot of questionable White House maneuvers. It seems if she was deliberately withholding files, stonewalling by using questionable legal tactics, and/or a host of possible other things it should be fair game for these hearings.

A lot of strange things happen during her tenure and the vast majority of Republicans that were politically active during that time still think there was a huge cover-up and questionable legal maneuvering. Sideshow or not, in my opinion they should examine the evidence now that they have the opportunity.


106 posted on 05/24/2010 5:22:04 PM PDT by BushCountry ( I spoken many wise words in jest, but no comparsion to the number of stupid words spoken in earnest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson