[Christian_Capitalist]

While I would vote for a Libertarian/Populist over a Democrat/Traitor any day, they do need to repudiate their past support for open borders. And as we see, when they do, they win elections. And frankly, the Paul's are more Populists rather than classic Libertarians. (Not that there is anything wrong with that)

So, you're only real objection to "Libertarians" are the ones who sit around their basement playing D&D and supporting Open Borders in theory, while never actually doing anything about it; whereas you're willing to admit that the Libertarians who actually get off their duff and get Elected, DO tend to be staunchly Pro-Border Security.

Well, you might acknowledge that, just for the sake of intellectual honesty.

[investigateworld]

(From IW:While I would vote for a Libertarian/Populist over a Democrat/Traitor any day,...)

See my italicized comment above.^

Can't make it any plainer.

And their whole business about who gonna pay for .gov is a bit goofy too.

Over all, they seem to be intelligent males, but haven't really thought out their positions - except for dope - guns - and bringing in hot wimmens from desperate nations*

*See: Bell, Art, late night radio host Who talks Libertarian but default vote is always Democrat.