Well, I’m sure that although a number of individuals trust in the “Global Warming” scientists and their published “studies” in scientific journals, this doesn’t automatically conclude that articles in these scientific journals are flawless, or motivated by political bias, obviously.
“Tell us about your scientific discipline, the years you’ve studied in that area, and what journals you find to be trustworthy.”
An individual doesn’t have to be a scientist in order to hold an opinion. Sell that liberal diatribe to the Kool Aid drinkers.
“...trolls when you don’t like answering the questions they ask.”
False equivocations.
I waste little time on noobs who appear to be trolls. Time and words will tell whether or not this newbie is a troll.
So you can't offer anything specific as to why you find these journals unworthy of your trust? Just as I thought.
An individual doesn’t have to be a scientist in order to hold an opinion. Sell that liberal diatribe to the Kool Aid drinkers
You suggested earlier that you had the knowledge and experience that qualified you to judge the references offered by Wikipedia as insufficient. You don't. That makes you a poser which is akin to being a liberal Kool-Aid drinker.
waste little time on noobs who appear to be trolls.
It looks like you call people names like noob when they ask questions you can't answer or don't like to answer. How long does one need to be a member here to challenge your knowledge of a particular topic?