Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hawthorn; InterceptPoint
Obama's "strongly approve" number is definitely slipping, which is largely driving his downward trend. Apparently, the honeymoon with his base that he enjoyed after the health scare bill was passed is wearing off. There appears to be upward movement on his "strongly disapprove," but it's lagging behind the other, and I'd give it a few more days to stabilise before saying whether it's a blip, a definite upward movement, or an upward movement to a new plateau of hopeychangey badness.
73 posted on 05/24/2010 8:55:59 AM PDT by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (We bury Democrats face down so that when they scratch, they get closer to home.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]


To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus; Recovering_Democrat; SoFloFreeper; OKSooner; InterceptPoint; ...

>> Obama’s “strongly approve” number is definitely slipping, which is largely driving his downward trend. <<

Yep. After the health takeover vote, the SA’s began rising, and the ten-day average reached a peak on April 7, at 31.6%. But now, the number has fallen to 26.8%. So in round numbers, the range has been ca. 5%.

In the meantime, over the same period, the ten-day average for the SD’s has never been higher than 42.00%, and never lower than 39.6%. Today it stands at 41.9%. So the range, again in round numbers, has been only ca. 2%

Therefore, if we use the above ranges as proxies for “solidity of conviction,” the SA’s appear twice as “mushy” or twice as “fickle” or twice as “uncertain” as the SD’s — certainly an excellent sign!

(For the statisticians out there: I think it’s also plausible to measure “mushiness” by standard deviations and coefficients of variation. But according to my calculations, the basic answer is always about the same: The SA’s are approximately twice as uncertain in their convictions as are the SD’s.)

>> Apparently, the honeymoon with his base that he enjoyed after the health scare bill was passed is wearing off.<<

Absolutely!

>> There appears to be upward movement on his “strongly disapprove” <<

Wish I could agree, but sorry to say that a quick glance at the data doesn’t persaude. Still hoping, however, to see such a trend later!

(I guess one could run some linear regressions and compare the correlation coefficients and/or t-scores for the regression coefficients, to examine whether there’s evidence of a trend over various time periods. But I really doubt the outcome would be positive, at least not for the time being.)


77 posted on 05/24/2010 10:35:30 AM PDT by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson