Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TheBigIf

I think you and I are in fair agreement on this. My understanding of the 1964 civil rights act is that it said you cannot discriminate based on race, period. Now, you may be right that this opens the door to other degenerates such as homosexuals etc... However, the civil rights act makes no mention of deviants, just race. We can fight this battle on it’s merits.

Even in the black community, I do not believe they equate the “rights” of homosexuals the same way they do civil rights. They vote in larger numbers against gay marriage than whites do when its on the ballot.


35 posted on 05/24/2010 7:39:52 AM PDT by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: Old Teufel Hunden

I can remember the first time I read about the “right to association” on the platform page of a Libertarian website and while I thought it made sense in regards to liberty I ended up rejecting it because of how it would allow for blatant racial discrimination. Now I see how this power can be so grossly abused as to include types of behavior and I seriously rethinking my stand on this. It is a travesty how there is a movement to force companies to have to treat homosexuality and trans-sexuality as equal to heterosexuality. It is already happening all over America. This aspect of the civil rights act is being used to deny people the right to association and the right of having their own moral conscience.


37 posted on 05/24/2010 8:00:33 AM PDT by TheBigIf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson