“The fact that he had a verified SSN issued in CT is odd, nothing more.”
How about that fact that his SS# was issued to someone else?
Does that seem more than odd?
Just how many times do the “authorities” have to tell you “move along now...there’s nothing to see here...MOVE ALONG”?
The so-called "proof" that someone else had the number is an internet database entry, with no name attached. It is very probably an error.
Here's Susan Daniels statement on that matter, from the same affidavit mentioned earlier:
"Further, the number assigned to Barack Obama may have been assigned previously, as it appears to also be associated with someone born in year 1890."
There's a good reason Daniels couched that in vague terms, if she wishes to keep her PI license. Here's the typical disclaimer for such database search results, from a document image of database search results for her primary opponent, also supplied by Susan Daniels, and posted on Orly Taitz' blog yesterday:
Important: The Public Records and commercially available data sources used on reports have errors. Data is sometimes entered poorly, processed incorrectly and is generally not free from defect. This system should not be relied upon as definitively accurate. Before relying on any data this system supplies, it should be independently verified.
There's no "independent verification" of this person's existence, or the assignment of that number previously to another person.