Posted on 05/23/2010 11:23:51 AM PDT by NormsRevenge
“Tea Party candidates will be easier to beat in November elections “
Isn’t that what they said about Reagan? Sleeps through cabinet meetings, is stupid, nothing more than a “B” movie actor?
They keep moving the goalposts. Remember the Tea Party was nothing but a just few angry racists? Remember then they were illigitimate Teabaggers? Now were going to lose in November, huh?
Pffft... which is it Democrats??
Every philly cop I have met has insisted that it was a know fact that Rendell was a homosexual.
Just sayin’.
I’m struck by the complete arrogance of the Democrat’s responses.
Between the marginalization of the Tea Party movement to the “economy is better” mantra, it’s almost as if the Democrats are trying to antagonize voters.
Wishful thinking Rendell, wishful thinking.
IMHO that means as clear as can be, exactly the opposite is the case.
180 degree opposite. Dems are getting spooked by the possibility the GOP may move right. Because then, they would have actual opponents.
And people would even consider voting for Republicans, who aren’t fraidy cats, of their own shadows.
My question: why is it, the article identified everyone’s party affiliation.
Except Rendell’s.
Just saying.
if anything it says that the dems are toast, because the Rat that won in PA 12 ran as a conservative to win in a 2:1 dem district, sounding off to the right of the Republican...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.